MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6969532005 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8320163

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) perparvum

2023· article· en· W6969532005 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaPennsylvanianHalictidaeMargin (machine learning)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) perparvum (Ellis, 1914) Figs 45–47, 76K, 78A, 79A, 80A, 115B, 116B Halictus perparvus Ellis, 1914: 102 (holotype, ♀, deposited in USNM, examined). Halictus pseudotegularis non auct. – Cockerell 1898: 237 (comparison to tegulare). Halictus perparvus – Cockerell 1916: 77 (comparative notes to helianthi). Halictus (Chloralictus) perparvus – Sandhouse 1924: 2 (key to species), 12 (comparison to ellisiae). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) perparvum – Michener 1951: 1116 (catalogue). Dialictus perparvus – Hurd 1979: 1970 (catalogue). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 121 (catalogue). Diagnosis Females of L. perparvum have the tegula relatively small (reaching but not exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), with inner posterior margin straight and a blunt posterior angle, and finely, sparsely punctate laterally (IS = 1–4 PD); mesoscutum densely punctate (IS <1 PD, becoming sparser (IS = 1–2 PD) anteromedially); metapostnotum very dull, finely reticulate, with fine subparallel rugae; T2 apical rim with scattered minute punctures bearing short simple setae; T4 disc with sparse tomentum; mesoscutum with sparse erect pubescence (each seta separated by about its length from the one nearest it and some gaps more than 0.5 OD visible in lateral view) and very short intervening setae no more than stubble; and mesoscutum greenish or golden, contrasting with bluer propodeum. Females of L. perparvum are most similar to those of L. holzenthali sp. nov., L. lepidii, L. magnitegula sp. nov., and L. profundum sp. nov., all of which (except L. magnitegula) have the mesoscutum with denser erect pubescence (each seta separated by less than its length from the one nearest it and no gaps more than 0.5 OD visible in lateral view) with short intervening setae 0.25 OD long or more, mesoscutum concolourous with propodeum, and metapostnotum shiny with weak microsculpture and strong, coarse rugae. In addition, females of L. holzenthali have the T1–T3 apical rims usually deeply and distinctly punctate and L. profundum have the tegula entirely impunctate except on anterior margin. Females of L. magnitegula have the tegula much larger (clearly exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), with inner posterior margin strongly concave, and densely punctate (IS <1 PD), T2 apical rim glabrous and impunctate, and T4 disc lacking tomentum. Males of L. perparvum have the tegula relatively small (as in the female); mesoscutum tessellate anteriorly and densely punctate laterally (IS <1 PD), with sparse erect pubescence (some gaps 0.5 OD or more visible in lateral view); metapostnotum tessellate to finely reticulate with fine subparallel rugae; discs of T1–T2 deeply and moderately densely punctate (IS = 1–2 PD); and mesoscutum more greenish or golden, contrasting with bluer propodeum. Males of L. perparvum are most similar to those of L. diabolicum sp. nov., L. ellisiae, and L. magnitegula sp. nov. Males of L. diabolicum and L. ellisiae have the mesoscutum usually shiny, concolourous with the rest of the mesosoma, and with dense erect pubescence (no gaps more than 0.5 OD visible in lateral view). Males of L. magnitegula have the tegula much larger (exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), with inner posterior margin strongly concave, and densely punctate (IS <1 PD); and mesoscutum usually shiny and more coarsely punctate laterally (IS ≤1 PD). In the Neotropics there are at least two (but possibly more) very similar, undescribed species. One of these has the tegula more coarsely and densely punctate laterally (IS <1 PD); the other has the mesoscutum with sparser punctures laterad of the parapsidal line (IS ≥ 1 PD) and T2 apical rim impunctate and glabrous in the female. Lasioglossum deludens sp. nov. is not especially similar to those of L. perparvum, but has been very often misidentified as L. perparvum and it is worth diagnosing the two specifically. Both sexes of L. deludens have the tegula translucent yellow-orange and impunctate (except on anterior margin) (opaque brown and punctate in L. perparvum), mesoscutum with dense erect pubescence (sparse in L. perparvum) and concolourous with propodeum (propodeum distinctly bluer in L. perparvum), and metapostnotum shiny with strong, coarse rugae (dull with fine rugae in L. perparvum). Females have the mesoscutum usually shiny (dull and tessellate in L. perparvum). Males have the face covered in dense tomentum up to upper ocular tangent (dense tomentum limited to paraocular area in L. perparvum). Etymology Ellis (1914) formed the specific epithet ʻ perparvus ʼ from the Latin prefix ʻ per- ʼ (very) and the adjective ʻ parvus ʼ (little). Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Arizona • ♀; Phoenix; [33.4° N, 112.1° W]; Kunzé leg.; USNM. Other material MEXICO – Baja California • 1 ♀; 9 km W of Pólvora; [32.55° N, 115.29° W]; 13 Jul. 1953; R.R. Snelling leg.; ex Tamarix; LACM. – Chihuahua • 1 ♂; Rio Conchos, 2 km W of Ojinaga; [29.56° N, 104.45° W]; 19 Jun. 1968; J.E. Hafernik leg.; TAMU-ENTO X1361793. – Sonora • 2 ♂♂; 10 mi. S of Guaymas; 27.9102° N, 110.7259° W; 8 Oct. 1968; George E. Bohart leg.; ex Antigonon sp.; BBSL1100987, BBSL1100988 • 1 ♂; 5.5 km ENE of Hornos, km 23, highway 116; 27.7285° N, 109.8448° W; elev. 40 m; 23–26 Jul. 2008; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP149246 • 1 ♂; Alamos; [27.02° N, 108.93° W]; 3 Sep. 1991; Terry L. Griswold leg.; BBSL849279 • 1 ♀; Arrollo El Limón, Rancho Las Lajas, 26 km E of Alamos; 27.0672° N, 108.7245° W; elev. 427 m; 20–22 Jun. 2008; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP754255 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 20–22 Jun. 2008; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP754257 • 1 ♂; Rancho El Cajón, 40 km E of Alamos; 27.05° N, 108.7318° W; elev. 420 m; 1–11 Oct. 2006; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP746038 • 1 ♂; Rancho Palo Injerto, 40 km E of Alamos; 27.042° N, 108.7337° W; elev. 425 m; 1–7 Oct. 2006; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP754482 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3002° N, 109.2625° W; 3 May 2002; N. de la Torre leg.; RLM SBV066649 • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 4 Jul. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV063726, SBV063988 • 1 ♀; ibid.; 14 Aug. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum; RLM SBV044363 • 2 ♂♂; ibid.; 14 Aug. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Rorippa nasturtiumaquaticum; RLM SBV044364, SBV044367 • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 14 Aug. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV044228, SBV044246 • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 14 Oct. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV045355, SBV045365 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 14 Oct. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV045358 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3002° N, 109.2626° W; 14 Oct. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV062871 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3072° N, 109.2568° W; 29 May 2004; N. de la Torre leg.; ex Tamarix ramosissima; RLM SBV025073 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3075° N, 109.2572° W; 16 Jun. 2004; A. Romero leg.; ex Tamarix ramosissima; RLM SBV054986 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.314° N, 109.2553° W; 15 Jun. 2004; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV054833 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3144° N, 109.2556° W; 6 Jun. 2004; R. Gyuro leg.; ex Tamarix ramosissima; RLM SBV062835 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3242° N, 109.2666° W; 24 Jul. 2005; N.M. Williams leg.; ex Convolvulus arvensis; RLM SBV052037 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3256° N, 109.2667° W; 9 Sep. 2007; A. Romero leg.; ex Physalis acutifolia; RLM SBV077987 • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3259° N, 109.288° W; 2 Apr. 2006; Robert L. Minckley et al. leg.; ex Physaria gordonii; RLM SBV056198, SBV056205 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3291° N, 109.2655° W; 13 Jul. 2000; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Convolvulus arvensis; RLM SBV079131. UNITED STATES – Arizona • 1 ♂; Cochise Co., Benson; [31.97° N, 110.29° W]; elev. 1091 m; 14– 15 Sep. 1974; E.G. Linsley, J.M. Linsley leg.; ex Helianthus annuus; CUIC • 2 ♀♀; Maricopa Co., 1100 W Mission Drive, Chandler; 33.346° N, 111.8599° W; elev. 367 m; 27 Mar. 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0112721, 0113164 • 5 ♀♀; Maricopa Co., 115 E Country Gables Drive, Phoenix; 33.6223° N, 112.0718° W; elev. 412 m; 18 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0113090, 0113098, 0113099, 0113102, 0113104 • 1 ♀; Maricopa Co., 1414 E Libra Drive, Tempe; 33.3656° N, 111.9163° W; elev. 365 m; 3 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 112726 • 4 ♀♀; Maricopa Co., 1738 E Palmcroft Drive, Tempe; 33.4044° N, 111.9099° W; elev. 361 m; 16 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0113361, 0113362, 0113368, 0113370 • 7 ♂♂; ibid.; 16 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0113380, 0113385, 0113387, 0113388, 0113393, 0113396, 0113398 • 1 ♀; Maricopa Co., 1926 E Calle De Caballos, Tempe; 33.3401° N, 111.9069° W; elev. 362 m; 10 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 113144 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 10 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 113193 • 2 ♀♀; Maricopa Co., 2031 S Sierra Vista Drive, Tempe; 33.406° N, 111.9308° W; elev. 357 m; 3 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0112746, 0112748 • 1 ♀; Maricopa Co., 302 E Fairmont Drive, Tempe; 33.3964° N, 111.9346° W; elev. 358 m; 30 Mar. 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 113448 • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; 27 Apr. 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0113467, 0113487, 0113493 • 1 ♂; Maricopa Co., 7 km SE of Wickenburg, Hassayampa River Preserve; 33.9097° N, 112.6752° W; elev. 550 m; 11–13 Sep. 2013; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP152452 • 1 ♂; Maricopa Co., 8201 E Windsor Avenue, Scottsdale; 33.4783° N, 111.9038° W; elev. 373 m; 11 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 112605 • 2 ♀♀; Maricopa Co., McDowell Sonoran Preserve; 33.644° N, 111.8567° W; elev. 516 m; 16 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 0113004, 0113088 • 1 ♀; Maricopa Co., Papago Park; 33.4571° N, 111.9424° W; elev. 391 m; 3 May 2017; S.J. Hall et al. leg.; ASUHIC 113247 • 3 ♂♂; Maricopa Co., Phoenix; [33.4° N, 112.1° W]; 7 Aug. 1994; Jerome G. Rozen, K. C. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; Maricopa Co., Phoenix, vicinity of 1300 North Washington Street; [33.4° N, 112.1° W]; 5 Oct. 2009; K.C. Rozen leg.; ex Euphorbia; AMNH • 1 ♀; Pima Co., Tucson; [32.2° N, 110.9° W]; 31 Jul. 1954; G.D. Butl

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207