MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6976736818 · doi:10.60692/r45h9-6ac94

The panorama of familial hypercholesterolemia in Latin America: a systematic review

2016· article· en· W6976736818 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreater South Information System · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFamilial hypercholesterolemiaLatin AmericansEthnic groupIndigenousPCSK9Systematic reviewMutation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The burden caused by familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) varies among countries and ethnic groups. The prevalence and characteristics of FH in Latin American (LA) countries is largely unknown. We present a systematic review (following the PRISMA statement) of FH in LA countries. The epidemiology, genetics, screening, management, and unique challenges encountered in these countries are discussed. Published reports discussing FH in Hispanic or LA groups was considered for analysis. Thirty studies were included representing 10 countries. The bulk of the data was generated in Brazil and Mexico. Few countries have registries and there was little commonality in FH mutations between LA countries. LDL receptor mutations predominate; APOB and PCSK9 mutations are rare. No mutation was found in an FH gene in nearly 50% of cases. In addition, some country-specific mutations have been reported. Scant information exists regarding models of care, cascade screening, cost, treatment effectiveness, morbidity, and mortality. In conclusion, FH is largely underdiagnosed and undertreated in the LA region. The genetic admixture with indigenous populations, producing mestizo's groups, may influence the mutational findings in Latin America. Potential opportunities to close gaps in knowledge and health care are identified. The burden caused by familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) varies among countries and ethnic groups. The prevalence and characteristics of FH in Latin American (LA) countries is largely unknown. We present a systematic review (following the PRISMA statement) of FH in LA countries. The epidemiology, genetics, screening, management, and unique challenges encountered in these countries are discussed. Published reports discussing FH in Hispanic or LA groups was considered for analysis. Thirty studies were included representing 10 countries. The bulk of the data was generated in Brazil and Mexico. Few countries have registries and there was little commonality in FH mutations between LA countries. LDL receptor mutations predominate; APOB and PCSK9 mutations are rare. No mutation was found in an FH gene in nearly 50% of cases. In addition, some country-specific mutations have been reported. Scant information exists regarding models of care, cascade screening, cost, treatment effectiveness, morbidity, and mortality. In conclusion, FH is largely underdiagnosed and undertreated in the LA region. The genetic admixture with indigenous populations, producing mestizo's groups, may influence the mutational findings in Latin America. Potential opportunities to close gaps in knowledge and health care are identified. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a syndrome that causes defective clearance of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and results in premature coronary heart disease (CHD) (1.Singh S. Bittner V. Familial hypercholesterolemia–epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening.Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2015; 17: 482-485Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 2.Najam O. Ray K. Familial hypercholesterolemia: a review of the natural history, diagnosis, and management.Cardiol. Ther. 2015; 4: 25-38Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 3.Benn M. Watts G. Tybjærg-Hansen A. Nordestgaard B. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217.Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 1384-1394Crossref PubMed Scopus (242) Google Scholar). Two forms have been reported: autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive. The vast majority of cases have the autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with 90% penetrance. Autosomal dominant FH is attributed to mutations in three different genes: LDL receptor (LDLR), APOB, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) (1.Singh S. Bittner V. Familial hypercholesterolemia–epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening.Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2015; 17: 482-485Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 3.Benn M. Watts G. Tybjærg-Hansen A. Nordestgaard B. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217.Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 1384-1394Crossref PubMed Scopus (242) Google Scholar, 4.Medeiros A. Alves A. Bourbon M. Mutational analysis of a cohort with clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia: considerations for genetic diagnosis improvement.Genet. Med. 2016; 18: 316-324Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar, 5.Nordestgaard B. Chapman M. Humphries S. Ginsberg H. Masana L. Descamps O. Wiklund O. Hegele R. Raal F. Defesche J. et al.Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus Statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society.Eur. Heart J. 2013; 34: 3478-3490aCrossref PubMed Scopus (1556) Google Scholar). Other FH genes have been searched for using exome sequencing without success (2.Najam O. Ray K. Familial hypercholesterolemia: a review of the natural history, diagnosis, and management.Cardiol. Ther. 2015; 4: 25-38Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). FH caused by mutations in LDLR adaptor protein (LDLRAP) is known as autosomal recessive FH (2.Najam O. Ray K. Familial hypercholesterolemia: a review of the natural history, diagnosis, and management.Cardiol. Ther. 2015; 4: 25-38Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). FH is the most common monogenic disorder leading to premature CHD; despite this fact, it is notoriously underdiagnosed and undertreated worldwide (6.Rynkiewicz A. Cybulska B. Banach M. Filipiak K. Guzik T. Idzior-Waluś B. Imiela J. Jankowski P. Kłosiewicz-Latoszek L. Limon J. et al.Management of familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia: Position Paper of the Polish Lipid Expert Forum.J. Clin. Lipidol. 2013; 7: 217-221Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar). Homozygous FH (HoFH) is characterized by extremely high levels of LDL-C (460–1,160 mg/dl) and early onset coronary artery disease (typically by the second decade of life) (7.Farnier M. Bruckert E. Severe familial hypercholesterolaemia: current and future management.Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012; 105: 656-665Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar). Mean LDL-C concentration in untreated patients is close to 615 mg/dl (7.Farnier M. Bruckert E. Severe familial hypercholesterolaemia: current and future management.Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012; 105: 656-665Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 8.Vogt A. The genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia and emerging therapies.Appl. Clin. Genet. 2015; 8: 27-36Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Patients are classified into two groups based on the level of LDLR activity, either <2% (receptor negative) or 2–25% (receptor defective). Receptor defective patients have a better prognosis than receptor negative cases (9.Ito M. Watts G. Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.Drugs. 2015; 75: 1715-1724Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 10.Santos R. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: phenotype rules!.Atherosclerosis. 2016; 248: 252-254Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 11.Bell D.A. Watts G.F. Progress in the care of familial hypercholesterolemia: 2016.Med. J. Aust. 2016; 205: 232-236Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar). Heterozygous FH (HeFH) is caused by a single inherited copy of a mutation. The frequency of a heterozygous mutation is >90, 5, and <1% in the LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 genes, respectively (5.Nordestgaard B. Chapman M. Humphries S. Ginsberg H. Masana L. Descamps O. Wiklund O. Hegele R. Raal F. Defesche J. et al.Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus Statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society.Eur. Heart J. 2013; 34: 3478-3490aCrossref PubMed Scopus (1556) Google Scholar). A causal mutation in one of these genes is identified in 60–80% of cases. Affected individuals are characterized by LDL-C levels two to three times greater than normal (190–400 mg/dl). The mean untreated LDL-C concentration is 199.9 mg/dl (12.Besseling J. Kindt I. Hof M. Kastelein J. Hutten B. Hovingh G. Severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and risk for cardiovascular disease: a study of a cohort of 14,000 mutation carriers.Atherosclerosis. 2014; 233: 219-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (132) Google Scholar). HeFH is suspected with an elevated LDL-C (LDL-C >190 mg/dl), the presence of xanthomas (tendinous/tuberous), corneal arcus (<45 years old), family history of FH, and either a personal or family history of premature coronary artery disease. Traditionally, the prevalence of HeFH is considered to be 1 in 500 individuals. This figure is based on the results of a European survey of familial lipoprotein disorders in myocardial infarction survivors (13.Goldstein J. Hazzard W. Schrott H. Bierman E. Motulsky A. Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease I. Lipid levels in 500 survivors of myocardial infarction.J. Clin. Invest. 1973; 52: 1533-1543Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 14.Genest J. Hegele R. Bergeron J. Brophy J. Carpentier A. Couture P. Davignon J. Dufour R. Frohlich J. Gaudet D. et al.Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement on familial hypercholesterolemia.Can. J. Cardiol. 2014; 30: 1471-1481Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar). However, recent work in a Dutch population estimated a prevalence of 1 in 137 persons (1.Singh S. Bittner V. Familial hypercholesterolemia–epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening.Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2015; 17: 482-485Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 10.Santos R. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: phenotype rules!.Atherosclerosis. 2016; 248: 252-254Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 11.Bell D.A. Watts G.F. Progress in the care

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,050

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0060,005
Bibliométrie0,0100,013
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreater South Information System→Même sujetLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→Travaux en français237 207→