The fishes of the Central Canadian Rockies Ecosystem
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I surveyed existing information in historical documents; technical publications and reports; selected file data held by Parks Canada, Alberta Fish and Wildlife and the British Columbia Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks; and interviewed reliable observers knowledgeable about selected waters to determine the native and present distribution of fishes within the Central Canadian Rockies Ecosystem (CCRE). Fifty-four species of fishes in 12 families have been reported to exist in or near the CCRE. Of these, only 33 are, or once were, native to some part of the study area or in connected adjacent waters. At least 10 native fishes have suffered impacts of significant conservation concern. One native subspecies (Banff longnose dace) is now extinct. One native species (chinook salmon) is certainly extirpated in the CCRE. Several other anadromous species (Pacific lamprey, white sturgeon, sockeye and steelhead stocks) native to the study area in the Columbia River mainstem or adjacent connected waters presumably are extirpated or landlocked. Many individual stocks of native fish also have been extirpated. Cutthroat trout and bull trout native stocks especially have been eliminated or severely depleted: both are now rare in most of the Bow River drainage. In particular, genetically-pure stocks of native westslope cutthroat trout in their native habitats are exceedingly rare and should be treated as endangered. A limited number of cutthroat stocks have been successfully introduced into previously fish-free drainages above barriers. Of the 21 introduced species, at least 13 have managed to persist somewhere within the CCRE. Introduced brook and brown trout have been especially successful, largely replacing native cutthroat and bull trout in many east slopes waters. Most rainbow trout stocks introduced into the upper Bow drainage evidently have failed to persist in the long term, but have introgressed extensively with native westslope cutthroats, especially in the Bow mainstem, Jumpingpound Creek, Elbow, Sheep and Highwood river drainages. Introduced lake trout stocks have replaced native bull trout in at least two BNP lakes even though certain native stocks of these two species coexist elsewhere in the CCRE. An introduced stock of northern Dolly Varden may pose a threat to a native bull trout stock being restored in the upper Kananaskis drainage. One introduced stock (cisco in Lake Minnewanka) derived from the Great Lakes may be of special value for conservation because stocks in lakes Ontario and Erie are thought to be endangered. The present fish fauna of the CCRE is overwhelmingly artificial, depauperate and dominated by exotic stocks; the native fish fauna largely obliterated. The ecological integrity of the natural Central Rockies Ecosystem has been irretrievably lost. A system of triage is required to salvage whatever remains of the natural state. A new set of ecosystem boundaries based on regional watersheds is proposed within which to organize aquatic ecosystem conservation and management in the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».