MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6977332179 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24219973.v1

Review of till geochemistry and indicator mineral methods for mineral exploration in glaciated terrain

2023· article· en· W6977332179 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBedrockClastic rockTraction (geology)Sedimentary rockContext (archaeology)CarbonateColluvium

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Appendix 3. Photographs of till: A selection of colour photographs of various till facies, from different glaciological, geological, and geographical settings. Photos 1 to 6 illustrate various types of subglacial traction tills that have been sampled for regional surveys by experienced Quaternary researchers across Canada. Photos 7 to 12 show those same tills, and how they would appear when sampling them. Photos 13 and 14 are of meltout tills, that may be sampled in proper context but care must be taken when interpreting the results from those samples. Photo 15 shows a colluvial deposit, comprising till that has been reworked into a gravity flow deposit. Appendix 3-Photo 1. Dense overconsolidated silty sand subglacial traction till with oxidation (organge iron staining) on the joint planes, from a till exposure overlying carbonate bedrock, southwestern Northwest Territories, northern Canada. Note that most of the clasts are subrounded. Knife for scale. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 2. Moderately indurated, weakly jointed, strongly fissle silt-sand subglacial traction till from a till exposure overlying carbonate bedrock, southwestern Northwest Territories, northern Canada. The clasts range from subrounded to subangular. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 3. Dense, overconsolidated clayey-silt subglacial traction till with weak jointing and minimal fissility, from a till exposure overlying Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, northern Alberta, western Canada. Note that the clast content appears to be low because only the indurated (exotic) clasts that are easily seen in the till exposure. Geotool is 75 cm long. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 4. Moderately compact clayey silt subglacial traction till with well-developed jointing and strong fissility, from a till exposure overlying Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, northern Alberta, western Canada. The upper part of the exposure has dried out, resulting in desiccation and separation of the till along shear planes. Hoe pick is 65 cm long. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 5. Meltout till from an exposure of till that was deposited during the recession of the last Irish Ice Sheet. Note the convoluted sandy interbeds. Rock hammer for scale. Photo by Isabelle McMartin. Appendix 3-Photo 6. Dense, strongly jointed, fissile sandy-silt subglacial traction till that is overlain by a weakly compacted sandy-silt meltout till, from an exposure in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, northern Alberta, western Canada. Note the difference in compaction/overconsolidation between the two tills and thus the resulting differences in structure. The grain size distribution and geochemical composition of the two tills are similar, only the depositional environment under the ice sheet is different. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photos 7 to 12. Subglacial traction tills as they appear when sampled. Photo 7: strongly jointed, weakly fissile till on a shovel, collected from the same region as till shown in Photo 1. Small knife for scale. Photo by Roger Paulen; Photo 8: weakly jointed, strongly fissile till on shovel, collected from same area as till shown in Photo 2. Photo by Beth McClenaghan; Photo 9: fissile sandy quartz-rich till on a shovel, collected from the same region as till shown in Photo 13. Photo by Roger Paulen; Photo 10: loose, structureless sandy till on a shovel, collected in permafrost terrain in the same region as Photo 14. Photo by Beth McClenaghan; Photo 11: chunk of clayey-silt till mostly derived from Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock, with few joints and no fissility, collected from the same region as Photo 3. Photo by Roger Paulen; Photo 12: disaggregated nature of strongly jointed and fissile clayey-silt till at bottom of photo, collected from the same region as till shown in Photo 4. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 13. Moderately compacted, sandy subglacial traction till from an exposure in the Proterozoic Athabasca sedimentary basin, northern Saskatchewan, central Canada. When sand-rich till is exposed to the elements, it loses its glacigenic properties due to the paucity of fine-grained matrix material (silt and clay) and it thus resembles loose quartz sand. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 14. Sandy subglacial traction till sampled in a frost boil that formed in a discontinuous permafrost landscape of the Canadian Shield, northern Labrador, eastern Canada. The cryogenic processes in the permafrost active layer have caused the sandy till to lose most of its glacigenic properties. Photo by Beth McClenaghan. Appendix 3-Photo 15. Crudely stratified diamict and bedrock fragments exposed in a 3 m deep exploration trench on the side of a mountain in central British Columbia, western Canada. Despite its till-like appearance, the material consists of subtle beds of clast-supported and matrix supported sediment that gently dip downslope (to the right side of photo) indicating that this material has moved after it was initially deposited as till upslope from this site. This material is not optimal for sampling because it has been displaced downslope. Photo by Roger Paulen.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0080,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,085
Tête enseignante GPT0,365
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshare→Même sujetGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→Travaux en français237 207→