Alexander Morris and the Saulteaux : the context and making of treaty three, 1869-73 / by Brian Walmark.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The primary purpose of this thesis is to explore and analyze the circumstances \nsurrounding the Treaty Three agreement between the Canadian government and the \nAnishinabe in 1873. The agreement is important for a number of reasons. The Anishinabe \nwon significant concessions from Canada that, not only led to the renegotiation of Treaties \nOne and Two, but set the standard for the rest of the numbered treaties across Western \nCanada as well. It is helpful to remember that while most of the other numbered treaties \nwere signed in a matter of weeks, Treaty Three was over four years in the making. The \nAnishinabe realized the value of their land and insisted on key demands from the Dominion \ngovernment. They remained committed to their basic position from 1869 when they first \nissued a copy of their demands to the Canadian government until 1873 when they finally \nsigned Treaty Three. These demands went far beyond what Indian agents were commissioned \nby the Canadian cabinet to agree to. The Anishinabe realized this and held up the talks until \nthey could negotiate with a representative of the Queen, who they believed had the authority \nto deal with their demands. In 1873, they received such an individual in Alexander Morris, \nthe Lieutenant-Governor of Manitoba and the North-West Territories. The Anishinabe could \nnot have realized at the time that Morris? instructions were as narrow as the other \nrepresentatives who had earlier attempted to negotiate a treaty with them. \nIt is not surprising that Morris has received much of the credit for negotiating Treaty \nThree which had eluded the Canadian government since the Riel Resistance. However, a \ncareful examination of the available evidence suggests that the agreement was made possible \nby the work of Simon Dawson and his associates Richard Pither and Nicholas Chatelain on \none hand and James McKay and other Metis leaders of the Red River community who accompanied Morris to Lake of the Woods in 1873. This paper argues that it was a \ncombination of these two factors, the rank that Morris enjoyed in the eyes of the Anishinabe \nand the role played Dawson, McKay and the rest of the Canadian negotiating team that led to \nthe successful agreement in 1873. \nIn the 1870?s, Canadian officials referred to the Anishinabe as the Saulteaux. There is \nno evidence available that suggests that they ever called themselves by this term. \nNevertheless, all of the primary and many of the secondary sources use the word Saulteaux, \nso, for sake of consistency and in order to avoid confusion, I have decided to use it \nthroughout this paper.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».