MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6980647960

Collecting Korean things: Actors in the formation of Korean collections in Britain (1876-1961)

2021· dissertation· en· W6980647960 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchive of research processes and output produced by RCA (Royal College of Art) · 2021
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePopulism, Right-Wing Movements
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnnexationContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)ColonialismOrder (exchange)ScarcityColonial period
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study investigates the British collecting of Korean objects in order to understand the transnational patterns and networks of material culture involved in the formation of British perceptions of Korea from 1876 to 1961. It focuses primarily on the mechanisms of collecting that prevailed in this period. As a result, it reveals the various actors involved and explores the collaborative processes that influenced and impacted collecting practices within the context of cultural identity.
\n
\nThe timeframe of the thesis begins with the opening of Korea’s ports, forced by Japan, in the late 1870s, encompasses Japanese annexation and concludes in the post-colonial period. This study is largely divided into three chronological parts, each of which represents a distinct period of political, social and cultural change. These also indicate the significant transitional aspects of collecting that are reflected in mainly British collections and publications.
\n
\nThe first chapter looks into Britain’s initial encounters with Korea in the last quarter of the nineteenth century in terms of British perceptions of Korea, through travellers’ accounts and scholarly literature. Using the examples of tiger skins and ceramics, it argues that the early display and collection of Korean art in Britain was limited, due to a scarcity of knowledge about Japanese and British imperialism. It was also affected by issues of authenticity emerging from Korea’s colonial modernity. The second chapter pivots around the turning point of 1910, when the dramatic changes caused by Japan’s annexation of Korea led to the arrival of increasing numbers of tourists and first-hand collectors, who in turn provided a new market for curio dealers in Korea. This chapter is primarily built on an examination of these dealers and the documentation/articles relating to their activity. The third chapter explores the impact of the 1910 Japan-British Exhibition in London, staged against a backdrop of mixed feelings about Japan’s status on the international scene. The colonial impetus behind this exhibition was shared with concomitant exhibitions in Tokyo and Seoul. It can be juxtaposed with the South
\nKorean government’s 1961 campaign to promote Korean art globally, which enables a discussion of the critical dilemma encountered when dealing with colonial data and knowledge. A final chapter considers the moon jar in the British Museum’s collection, renowned for its
\nconnection to several British studio potters. This chapter challenges the dominance of Yanagi Sōetsu’s legacy in the history of the moon jar by examining concurrent cultural movements and collecting fashions in Korea within the context of the nationalist movement and the reinterpretation of tradition by Korean artists and collectors during the 1930s.
\n
\nThis thesis adopts an Actor-Network Theory (ANT) approach, which allows for autonomous performance in the agency of actors, within the idea of culture as a network of association. This theoretical framing reveals the complex transnational nature of collecting, and the overlapping of different colonial regimes and forms of colonial modernity. This study therefore challenges the long tradition of British and Japanese Orientalist approaches, and the way in which their intertwined relationships have imposed a master narrative upon the aesthetic values and appreciation of Korean material culture since the late nineteenth century. The unveiling of a variety of actors in this context contributes to a new micro-history and cultural narrative that will continue to support and build upon contemporary decolonising discourses in the art and design history of Korea, as well as in the current museological context.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,151
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,349
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchive of research processes and output produced by RCA (Royal College of Art)Même sujetPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsTravaux en français237 207