Cretaceous–Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution of The Southwestern and Northeastern Extents of the North American Cordillera in the Western U.S.A
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The mid–late Mesozoic era was a time of significant climate, paleogeographic, and tectonic reorganization of western North America. By the Late Jurassic (ca. 155 Ma), subduction of the Farallon oceanic slab beneath the western margin of the North American plate established a classic Cordilleran-type orogenic system extending from southern Mexico to Canada and Alaska. Late Cretaceous––Eocene flat slab subduction during the Laramide event partitioned the continental-scale foreland basin with basement-involved uplifts and intervening intraforeland basins and an inboard migration of magmatic arc activity. While the Cordilleran orogenic belt is typified by the Sevier fold-thrust belt and foreland basin and the Laramide province, important issues remain to be settled regarding the tectonic evolution of these systems and hence the North American Cordillera in the southwestern margin of the U.S.A. \tThis work therefore targets the anomalously thick (3–7 km) McCoy Mountains Formation in southeastern California–western Arizona to reconstruct the paleogeographic and tectonic history of the southwestern U.S.A. and its spatiotemporal relationship to the North American Cordillera. Detailed sedimentologic, detrital zircon, and provenance results from the McCoy Mountains Formation at its type locality in the McCoy Mountains of southeastern California indicate that this ~7 km thick succession was deposited entirely during the Cretaceous between ca. 137 and 70 Ma and was characterized by deep-water turbidite systems. Subsidence analysis suggests that the McCoy Mountains Formation was deposited within a subaqueous flexural foreland basin loaded by the Maria fold-thrust belt to the north-northeast and possibly the Mule Mountains thrust to the southwest (Appendix A). Continuing work in western Arizona builds upon this model by correlating the ~3.5 km thick succession of clastic strata exposed at the Livingston Hills with the type section in California using detailed sedimentology, detrital zircon, and provenance analyses. Results suggest that the Livingston Hills strata were deposited during the Late Cretaceous after ca. 96 Ma, consist of relatively deep water turbidite deposits, and are correlative with the upper portion of the McCoy Mountains Formation in California. Bedding geometries in the lower Livingston Hills strata are typical of syn-contractional growth strata and provide evidence for wedge-top deposition within the McCoy retroarc foreland basin (Appendix B).\nThermochronological results from the McCoy Mountains Formation, Maria fold-thrust belt, and Mule Mountains thrust in California suggest that the eastern Mojave transitioned from relatively deep-water basin deposition and regional shortening to regional cooling as early as ca. 70 Ma. We suggest that cooling Late Cretaceous–Eocene cooling was driven by uplift and erosion associated with flat slab subduction and emplacement of the Orocopia Schist. This was coeval with cooling ca. 70–50 Ma farther northeast in the Arizona Transition Zone, supporting that exhumation associated with bulldozing of continental lower crust and mantle lithosphere during Laramide flat-slab subduction was rapid and regional in scale (Appendix C).\nExpanding the investigation of the Laramide event to the northeast, Appendix D focuses on the topographic development of the Wyoming Laramide province. Apatite fission track thermochronological results from key Laramide uplifts and intraforeland basins indicate that the Wyoming Laramide region experienced rapid cooling between ca. 75 and 50 Ma, contemporaneous with the southwestern U.S. Cordillera. However, in contrast to the southwestern U.S. Cordillera, where cooling was a response to the underplating of trench-derived schists, cooling in the Wyoming Laramide region occurred along discrete basement-cored uplifts. Additionally, these results indicate that Laramide ranges were subsequently buried by Cenozoic basin fill deposited between 50 and 10 Ma. Our results suggest that Wyoming's modern topography is a relatively young feature that began to develop after ∼10 Ma due to widespread incision and sediment evacuation along continental-scale river systems such as the paleo-Mississippi.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».