The correct name for the Canadian Pine grosbeak
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
x9o2 -I General 2Votes.8 5 point.Under date of June 25, •895 (Londonderry, Vt.),I find: '• In Chapman's new ' ttandbook of the Birds of Eastern North A•nerica,' Dr. Dwight gives •-z•d-•-O?3 as the song of E. traillli [ = E. •. alnorum ].Hearing the song at a distance this smnmer I preferred Mr. Brewster's rendering kd-wt'•t.•,but, getting nearer to-day, I find Dr. Dwight's a pretty exact rendering, though I myself should put it w•-z•d-t03 , the %/5 very faint."(If it •vere not superfluous, I should like to compliment Dr. Dwight on the felicity of his descriptions and syllabifications of bird-songs.)The other passage is dated at Willoughby Lake, Vt., June •8, •896: "In a swampy place southeast of the house I saw two EmySidonax traœll&'alnorum, one of which, perhaps the male, had an emphatic k'weel which was new to me?I may add that I was no nearer this bird than I have often been, both before and since, to others uttering the familiar t•vo-syllabled song-note, and the difference between the two notes was so marked that there could have been no confusing them.--FRxNC•S}I.ALLEN, West J/½oxbtt ry, •ss.The Correct Name for the Canadian Pine Grosbeak.--Canadensœs(Brehm, •8S•),as the subspecific name for the eastern Pine Grosbeak is long antedated by Loxœa lettcura of Mfiller (Volls.Natm'syst.Suppl.undRegister-Band, •776, •5o), whose name, based on Buffoh's P1.Enl.•S5, fig.•, will have to be recognized.This for:n should properly be called Pœnlcola enuclealor leucura (Mfiller).--CHas.W. IgJas,•z'norr{on, D.C.The Labrador Savanna Sparrow.--I hay% since describing Passerculus savanna labradorœu& learned more from various sources of its range, habits, and migrations which seem of interest to present.The species inhabits Labrador as far north certainly as Port 3,lanvers, and probably further--though the bird is apparently most common on the southern Labrador.It is known as the 'Chipbird,' as are most of the small sparrows in the north, and is mentioned by all, I think, of the writers on the Labrador avifauna.I have examined nearly a hundred or more speci•nens of Passerctdus s. savanna frown Newfoundland and southward since describing the race, with the result that I find Newfoundland and Cape Breton birds approach most closely the Labrador race in measure-ment% as would be expected, one bird in particular from Cape Breton measuring, wing 2.87, bill .39X .24•which slightly overlaps the smallest Labrador bird •neasured.Two other specimens from Labrador have also been sent me from Bowdoin College, taken on the expedition to Labrador in •89•.Both birds, one a male, and one unsexed, were taken at Chateau Bay on July •4 and are in very worn breeding plmnage.The male measures, wing 2.86, tail •.83, tarsus .83,bill .42X .2.5.The other, wing 2.75, tail L87, tarst•s .8o,bill .4•X .24.On the migrations an occasionally very large Savanna Sparro•v has been noticed by observers and collectors, which are referable to this form, and I have in my collection Vol.XIX] x9o2 -I General 2Votes.8 5 point.Under date of June 25, •895 (Londonderry, Vt.),I find: '• In Chapman's new ' ttandbook of the Birds of Eastern North A•nerica,' Dr.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,796 | 0,674 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».