DEGRADATION OF SOFC AND SOEC AND ITS IMPACT ON SYSTEM OPERATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The key to a cleaner future is to alleviate reliance of energy sectors on non-renewable fossil fuel sources and reduce their environmental burdens. This can be achieved by using power generation units such as Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) that use natural gas more efficiently compared to the existing fossil fuel-based technologies as well as energy storage units such as Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) that enable increase in the amount of intermittent renewable power supply. This thesis describes the models constructed for conventional SOFC and SOEC degradation to show how performance of these cells degrade over long periods of time under their operating conditions. The goal of this thesis is to evaluate the economic and environmental performance of SOFC and SOEC under degradation and compare them to the existing technologies. In this thesis project, the economically optimal sizing, and trajectories of natural gas-SOFC and SOEC are found considering their degradation. Impacts of SOFC capital cost, price of natural gas, and CO2 tax on economic performance of SOFC and impacts of SOEC capital cost and price of electricity on economic performance of SOEC are quantified to help decision makers evaluate economic feasibility of these cells in different locations. Economical operation of an SOFC plant requires lowering its current density slowly over time which results in power output reduction. This can limit the application of SOFC for communities that need constant load of power all the time. To combat this issue, this thesis also focuses on scheduling start-up of optimally operated SOFC modules such that SOFC system as a whole has a constant power output. This thesis assesses environmental performances of SOFC and SOEC and compares them with the existing technologies. A detailed life cycle analysis of optimally operated natural gas-fueled SOFC plant under degradation is performed using ReCiPe 2016 and TRACI 2.1 US-Canada 2008 methods. Then, it compares the major environmental impact categories of this plant with those of two mature technologies that use natural gas for power generation. Moreover, life cycle greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted from manufacturing SOEC and its power source are quantified to assess environmental performance of SOEC. This is performed for SOECs with various power sources from low GHG emission sources to high GHG emission ones. The levelized cost of hydrogen and life cycle GHG emissions of SOECs with different power sources are then compared to those of other hydrogen generation units. SOFC can serve as an efficient, cost-effective, environmentally friendly option for power only or heat and power generation in many places even at high natural gas prices and carbon taxes. While SOEC, despite its high efficiency, might not be a very economical or environmentally responsible option for hydrogen production when the price of electricity is high and power supply has high GHG emissions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».