Development and Initial Testing of a Brief Mindfulness Meditation Training Intervention for Preoperative Patients: An Application of the ORBIT Model
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over 1,500,000 surgical procedures occur in Canada every year. Although medical and technological advances have greatly improved outcomes, surgery is not risk free: for instance, 3-16% of patients receiving general anesthesia will experience a perioperative complication; and approximately 30% of arthroplasty patients report an adverse event. Biomedical, social, and psychological factors have all been associated with poor surgical outcomes and perioperative complications. One such factor is preoperative distress, an acute stress reaction experienced by a patient in response to impending surgery. Individuals with higher preoperative distress experience more adverse events, like delayed wound healing and mortality. The psychological technique of mindfulness meditation is associated with improved health and well-being, and is suggested as a potential tool for mitigating preoperative distress. Informed by the mindfulness mediation literature, Social Cognitive Theory, and the ORBIT Model of Developing Behavioural Treatments for Chronic Disease, this dissertation aimed to develop and test a mindfulness meditation protocol for patients undergoing elective surgery. Research took place in three parts, corresponding with Phases IA, IB, and IIA of the ORBIT Model. Study One utilized a theory-guided, mixed-methods design, in which surgical wait-list patients (N = 31) and health care providers (N = 20) provided feedback regarding their perceptions of and preferences concerning preoperative mindfulness meditation. In Study Two, Study One findings were integrated with the results of a literature review to develop a theory-grounded and evidence-based mindfulness meditation intervention. The intervention was reviewed by both health professionals (N = 16) and surgical wait-list patients (N = 14), who reported that it was both acceptable and beneficial. Lastly, Study Three was a proof-of-concept study in which the mindfulness meditation intervention was tested via randomized controlled trial. Surgical wait-list patients (N = 66) received either standard care or standard care plus mindfulness meditation. Results indicated small but consistent pre-post meditation improvements in health/wellness perceptions, suggestive that a brief, online meditation bestows an acute benefit. Between-group differences in perioperative health, mental health, and functioning variables were primarily non-significant and small. Together, the three studies suggest that a brief, online mindfulness meditation program is feasible and may produce acute changes in patient health. However, many questions remain regarding the role of mindfulness meditation during the perioperative window. Namely: Is there something unique within the perioperative environment that renders (brief, online) mindfulness meditation non-effective? Do patients require a greater “dose” of mindfulness meditation to see an effect? (And, if so, are these higher-dose interventions feasible?) What surgical- or patient-level factors might moderate effects?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».