Development of optimal breeding zones for white spruce in Ontario under current, past, and anticipated future climate change / by Ashley Marie Thomson.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Tree breeding zones are delimited areas where trees are selected and bred, and their progeny are planted. Within these zones, the level of adaptation between seedlings and planting sites is controlled to ensure adequate survival and growth. Delineation of adaptively-based zones requires detailed knowledge of patterns of genetic variation within species. \nFive-year height, root-collar diameter, current increment and survival were \nmeasured at each of six Ontario white spruce provenance trials containing 127 sources from across Ontario and western Quebec. Survival generally did not demonstrate significant variation amongst provenances, except at the Englehart test site, while the remaining three traits were significant at most sites. Intraclass correlation coefficients for significant traits ranged from 0.7% for elongation at the Englehart site to 19.2% for survival at the Englehart site. Growth data from 2007 were combined with 2002-2004 \ngrowth and phonological data. Principal components analysis was used to summarize the main components of variation, explaining a total of 53.8% of the total variation with the first three axes. The first principal component represented mainly growth potential, while the second and third represented field trial phenology and greenhouse timing, respectively. Multiple linear regressions revealed significant correlations to both temperature and precipitation variables, explaining 28%, 53%, and 27% o f the total \nvariation in the first three principal components axes. Regression equations were used to map predicted performance of white spruce across the study area of Ontario. \nThe focal point seed zone procedure (FPSZ) was used to determine areas of adaptive similarity for each of 618 gridpoints across Ontario based on current climate. These areas were used to represent candidate breeding zones constructed at levels of +/- 1.0 and +/- 0.5 least significance difference values. A maximal-covering model was then used to determine the optimal combination of a specified number of zones that could be \nused to maximize the area covered by breeding zones. Thirteen breeding zones were required to cover the entire range of white spruce in Ontario at the 1.0 LSD level of adaptive similarity, while more than 40 zones were required at the 0.5 LSD level. The northwest and northeast forest management regions could be covered with 6 breeding zones at the 1.0 LSD level and the southern region with just 5 zones. \nThe analysis was repeated using simulated past climate data from the CGCM2, HADCM3, and CSIRO climate models as input to the procedure. The HADCM3 model produced optimal breeding zones that were most similar to those developed for the current climate and is probably most reliable for predicting climate in Ontario. Future climate data for the same 3 models based on the A1 and B2 emissions scenarios was used to predict the location of future breeding zones for each of the six future climate \nscenarios. The HADCM3 model predicted the location of future zones to be relatively similar to those based on current climate, while CSIRO predicted wide shifts in the location of future zone boundaries and CGCM2 predicted moderate shifts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».