An Evaluation on Residential Satisfaction in Historic Urban Quarters: The Case of the Walled City, Famagusta
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study aims to evaluate residential satisfaction in historic urban quarters which are\ncharacterized by relatively higher architectural, cultural, and aesthetic values than nonhistoric areas. Nevertheless, historic urban quarters threat more by significant physical\nand social decay and undesirable environment, functional and physical obsolescence,\nand poor-quality buildings, material and constructions. These challenges lead to reduce\nthe satisfactions’ levels of residents who live in historic urban quarters as their\ncontemporary needs are not provided and living standards are usually lower.\nConsequently, to achieve this aim, this study provides extensively a list of factors on\nthe basis of social, environment, economic, and culture dimensions to evaluate\nresidential satisfaction within the contextual provisions of historic urban quarter of\nWalled City, Famagusta. Besides, this study collected 245 questionnaires from\nhouseholds residing in the historic urban quarters of the Walled City, Famagusta and\nalso 167 households residing outside of the quarters to assess their perception of the\nidentified factors, as well as examine the agreement levels in the opinions of the two\nparticipant groups. This study also used the mix method including both the qualitative\nand quantitative approaches to identify important factors of satisfaction based on\nresident’s perception, expectations, and experiences. Using principal component\nanalysis (PCA), the results show that eight factors are only important from residents’\nperceptions. Findings show that from the economic dimension, “Cost of housing”,\n“Tenure options” and “Cost of living within the Walled City” are the most important\nfactors of satisfaction. From the social dimension, results showed the “Suitable\nmanagement rules”, “Security/safety concerns” and “Level of social mix in housing\nenvironment” are the most important factors of satisfaction. From the environment\ndimension, results showed the “Open spaces and green areas” is the most important\nfactor of satisfaction. From the culture dimension, results showed the “Suitability of\nhousing to occupant’s culture” is the most important factor of satisfaction. The\nfindings of this study will help to better understand the residents’ perceptions,\nexpectations and experiences in historic urban quarter of the Walled City, Famagusta\nand are useful to housing policy decision-makers, urban planners, and municipalities\nto improve residential environments in line with the contemporary needs and\nexpectations of residents. The results of this study also provide some insights that\ncontribute to residential satisfaction literature as it opens a new window for further\nstudies to test and apply the important factors in a case-study based survey of other\nhistoric houses and urban areas. Furthermore, it can be considered a crucial step in the\nsustainable development process, as identifying the determinants of residential\nsatisfaction helps to satisfy the contemporary needs of residents in physically degraded\nand urban fabric deteriorated historical environments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».