The Genetic Resources Policy Initiative Newsletter: September 2006
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the second quarter of 2006, the GRPI Project registered increased participation from stakeholders and institutions working on country-specific activities designed to support the research and development of law and policy as it relates to PGRFA. The activities which include: Strengthened capacity of domestic governments to 'mainstream' interdepartmental coordination and multi-stakeholder consultation concerning GRFA-related policy-making and implementation; Research papers linking national sectoral activities, socio-economic analysis and development goals to policy options; and Draft national policies are expected to advance in a positive way throughout the remaining part of this year. It is expected that concerted efforts will drive the processes to fruition within the time frame determined under the current institutional framework. Marking a very remarkable achievement during the same quarter, the first meeting of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture adopted several decisions to help the world community fight global poverty and hunger. Among the most important was the adoption of the standard Material Transfer Agreement (sMTA). The sMTA is a uniform contract that enables easier access to crop biodiversity for farmers and scientists alike. It sets out the terms that govern access and benefit sharing and will accompany all transfers of genetic materials. In this edition of our newsletter, we focus on a number of important activities and events that occurred in GRPI countries and sub regions in the second quarter of the year as well as highlights on new developments in the secretariat. We also include a new section on the current policy trends. In this issue we present an article on the registration of enhanced rice varieties in Nepal. The status of our information sharing initiatives on the internet and networking activities is also highlighted. Information is provided on forthcoming events including the GRPI project wide meeting which is scheduled for early November this year. Finally, we acknowledge with thanks all contributions to this newsletter, especially from our stakeholders in various national programmes who shared the activities they carried out in the immediate past - and which gave us an in-depth insight into the current research course. The purpose of this newsletter is to inform all our national partners and stakeholders of activities and events that are taking place in the Project. The unique design of this newsletter allows for quick and easy access to articles of interest to you. New articles will be added every time we produce the newsletter. Older newsletters will be archived and may be made available upon request. There will be four editions of this newsletter. The purpose of having quarterly editions is to target information that is relevant to your needs. For more information, do not hesitate to contact. As always, we would like to extend our gratitude to all national partners and stakeholders who have played an instrumental role in our efforts aimed at strengthening capacity to analyse national options.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,080 | 0,044 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».