Identifying the gaps towards an inclusive educational system within Québec: collectively examining the perceptions of different groups of educators
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The studies presented in this thesis examine the perceptions and experiences of different groups of educators working in inclusive settings in Montréal, Québec at the elementary school level. In Study 1, survey data from 600 educators (regular classroom teachers, resource teachers, non-teaching professionals and support staff) were analyzed to assess their knowledge and attitudes (challenges, stressors and success) about working with students with developmental disabilities in an inclusive school setting. Findings reveal that various groups of educators reported having limited knowledge regarding different developmental disabilities (e.g., the non-teaching professionals group reported the least amount of knowledge relative to the other groups of educators). Furthermore, this study revealed that there is great variability between different groups of educators with regard to their attitudes in working in an inclusive school setting. Study 2 adds to this work by exploring the phenomenon of school inclusion from the perspective of various educators (i.e., 5 regular classroom teachers, 10 non-teaching professionals and 5 support staff) who work with children with different developmental disabilities. This study is located within a social constructivist qualitative research paradigm that used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to gain a rich understanding of the different experiences of educators working in an inclusive educational setting. Two research questions guided this study: (1) How do educators understand their experiences working with children with different developmental disabilities in an inclusive educational setting? and (2) How do educators see the future of school inclusion within Québec? Findings reveal three main categories that affect the adoption of inclusive practices: (1) internal challenges within the inclusive classrooms, (2) systemic challenges within the inclusive setting, and (3) lack of a shared vision of inclusion among educators. Furthermore, this qualitative study revealed a unique challenge (i.e., trying to facilitate inclusive education in a province where their educational system is divided by language, French and English) that can hinder the practice and implementation of school inclusion in Québec. The final discussion chapter centers on the interplay between Study 1 and 2. Results, whether quantitative or qualitative, reveal the differences and similarities between the various groups of educators with respect to their perceptions and experiences working in an inclusive educational setting. These similarities and differences shared by all educators may be seen as important predictors of the success or failure of school inclusion. Implications for policy and the practices of the different educators working in an inclusive school are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».