Knowledge as Revealed in Built Form: Architecture’s Hermeneutic Potentials (Piscinas das Marés in Leça da Palmeira, Álvaro Siza) to the Transvaluation Symposium in Göteborg 21-22 May 2015.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The term knowledge can be ambiguous, and has been largely appropriated by scientific method to signify the accumulation of verifiable facts. But this kind of knowledge formation is only a part of how we understand ourselves and the world in which we exist. Although it greatly impacts on the world and our lives, it lacks the tools to reflect on that impact. That is not to say that it does not have value. But its value does not warrant the subjugation of other kinds of knowledge formation and neither is it a universally appropriate method. The work of Álvaro Siza is widely recognised as, not only being sensitive to its context but also, highlighting and often intensifying elements of its surroundings. This kind of ‘making’, which draws on memory and tradition, reveals elements of its situation and contributes to our understanding of that situation. When framed in this way it becomes apparent that it is a valuable source of knowledge formation in relation to how we ‘make’ (poiesis) and how we ‘live’ (praxis). The design of Siza’s saltwater pools at Leça da Palmeira (1961-66) reveals elements of the landscape, built environment, and social and cultural situation. The work reveals these things in the way it transforms the environment and represents the world of which it is part. It is, therefore, valuable in its own right in the formation of knowledge. And research into it and other works can further reveal the processes through which this is achieved both in relation to its poetics and the lived world it transforms. Drawing on Martin Heidegger’s concept of truth as ‘unconcealedness’ (aletheia) this paper explores how transforming our environment through 'making’ has the potential to reveal elements of the historical tradition in which the ‘making’ is situated. The historical nature of existence necessitates that the sense-making structure that is the world is always encountered within a particular horizon. Understanding, therefore, always takes place within a particular application. Understanding in this sense is not a movement towards an absolute truth or complete knowledge. However, the processes of understanding are revealing in their individual applications. In relation to the world that we ‘make’, if we are conscious of the horizon through which we encounter the world our transformations of the environment have the potential to cultivate the collective understanding of the built environment and the world in which it exists. Architectural knowledge is manifest precisely in the application and adaption to particular circumstances. Siza is fond of saying that ‘architects are not inventors but rather they transform the reality that surrounds them.’ Through this transformation architecture has the potential to reveal elements of that reality. What architecture has to offer the practice of scientific research is an awareness of its situatedness, through revealing elements of the historical tradition in which it takes place. The potential of architecture to reveal its situation can be realised through the practice of critical architecture, which Jane Rendell describes as ‘a form of design practice that occupies the territory between form and culture.’ The concept of knowledge as revealed through the transformation of the environment can lead to a greater understanding of ourselves and the world in which we exist. It, therefore, has the potential to ‘transvalue’ research cultures in ways that move away from the false objectification of evaluation-controlled-knowledge-production. Key references: Gadamer, H.G. 2004. Truth and Method. London & New York: Continuum.. Heidegger, M. 1975. The Origin of the Work of Art. In: M. Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. A. Hofstader. New York & Toronto: Harper & Row. Siza, Á. 1997. Siza: Architecture Writings. Milan: Skira. Vesely, D. 2004. Architecture in the age of divided representation: the question of creativity in the shadow of production. London & Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,016 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».