MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6983220311

Litauiske statsborgere i Norge 1940-45

2013· dissertation· en· W6983220311 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen) · 2013
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean Cultural and National Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGovernment (linguistics)PretextSubject (documents)HeadlinePopulationInterpretation (philosophy)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study examines the presence of Lithuanian citizens in Norway during the Second World War, with the intent of distinguishing them from other displaced persons from Soviet controlled territories. It identifies 843 such individuals present in the country in 1945, based on information found in the archives left by the national repatriation authorities. This group consisted exclusively of men, and contained individuals with a variety of background stories. I counted among its ranks both volunteers, drafted personnel and victims of forced recruitment. All of them were organized in various German units. The majority of this national group was made up by ethnic Lithuanians, most of who were recruited for labor service against their will. A smaller minority consisted of Lithuanians of German decent, who had become subject to German draft laws after the annexation of Memel in 1939. They served as soldiers in various units within the German Wehrmacht. Upon the German capitulation, the group of Lithuanians found themselves in a situation where a large number of them were given the opportunity to resist repatriation and instead chose relocation in the west. This was due to the way the western allies interpreted the Jalta agreement, which in their mind did not extend forced repatriation to citizens from nations occupied by the Soviet Union after the outbreak of war. A large number of Lithuanians chose relocation, and this sparked considerable controversy in the early postwar years. The Soviet Union was fiercely opposed to the western interpretation of the Jalta agreement, and demanded the extradition of every individual whose home was located within their borders of 1945. Allied authorities in the west refused such repatriation, and the conflict reached considerable levels in Norway. The group of Lithuanians was at the center of this controversy, since they refused repatriation in large numbers. This widespread unwillingness to return home has been seen by some historians as an indication that a large number of these people feared reprisals upon their return, as a result of collaboration or even participation in war crimes. This perception can find support in claims made by some authors that Lithuanians were overrepresented among the Wehrmacht soldiers who volunteered as guards in POW-camps, and that Lithuanians were among the preferred nationalities when the Germans recruited such guards from the prisoner population. Such allegations were also forwarded by the Soviet authorities during the conflict over repatriation, but were all dismissed by the allied authorities. This study has tried to uncover any indications that the Lithuanians in Norway participated in war crimes or wide spread collaboration, but has not lead to any information that can support such claims. It seems that the determining factors when making the choice weather to return or not, rather were tied to the age and family situation of the individual. Older men with a wife and children in Lithuania tended to want to go back, while younger men without such commitments tended to choose relocation to the west. The vast majority of these wanted to be sent to the United States or Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,254
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen)Même sujetEuropean Cultural and National IdentityTravaux en français237 207