MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6983257740

Low Back Pain During and After Spaceflight: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2024· article· en· W6983257740 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpaceflight effects on biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLow back painRehabilitationKinesiologyPain medicineHealth scienceBack painPerioperativeIncidence (geometry)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Guillermo Ceniza-Bordallo,1,* Eric Zimmermann,2,* Marie Vigouroux,2 Kacper Niburski,3 Maryse Fortin,4 Jean Ouellet,5– 7 Juan Pablo Cata,8,9 Pablo M Ingelmo2,7,10,11 1Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Podiatry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 2Edwards Family Interdisciplinary Center for Complex Pain, Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; 3Department of Anesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 4Department of Health, Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 5Department of Paediatric Surgery & Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; 6Department of Scoliosis & Spine Surgery, Shriner’s Hospital for Children, Montreal, QC, Canada; 7Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 8Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, the University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 9Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA; 10Department of Anesthesia. McGill University, Montreal, Canada; 11Research Institute, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Guillermo Ceniza-Bordallo, Email gceniza@ucm.esAbstract: Space flights can produce physiological changes in the spine, leading to the development of acute and chronic pain in passengers. However, there is a lack of comprehensive literature exploring physiological spine changes and acute and chronic pain in space passengers (astronauts and animals). The first aim of this study was to identify the physiological changes experienced by passengers (humans and animals) after space flight. The second aim was to identify the incidence of low back pain during and after space flight. This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and was pre-registered in PROSPERO (ID 451144). We included Randomized Controlled Trials or longitudinal studies in humans and animals, and the variables must be assessed either in-flight or post-flight. We conducted a literature search in major databases combining the keywords: Pain; Space; Low Back Pain; Astronauts; Spine Changes; Microgravity; Physiological Changes; Humans; Animals. Risk of bias and quality of studies were analyzed, and the level of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. After duplicates were removed, 115 abstracts were screened by two reviewers, and finally, 11 articles were included in this review. The evidence indicates that astronauts experience muscle atrophy in the lumbar multifidus with a moderate to large effect, especially in the L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments. Space flights also decrease the range of motion with a moderate effect, along with disc herniations and disc dehydration. 77% of astronauts experience pain during spaceflight, and 47% develop acute pain after spaceflight. Chronic pain was reported by 33% of the astronauts. After space flights, astronauts suffer from lumbar muscle atrophy, reduced range of motion, disc herniations, and disc dehydration, with a high incidence of both acute and chronic pain.Plain Language Summary: Space travel affects the spine and can cause both immediate and long-term pain. Our study aimed to understand what changes happen in the spine during and after space travel and how often these changes lead to low back pain.Why was the study done?We wanted to investigate the specific spinal changes and the frequency of low back pain in both astronauts and animals exposed to space travel. This is important because understanding these effects can help improve health interventions for space travelers.What did the researchers do?We reviewed studies that examined spine changes and pain in humans and animals during and after space flights. We used a systematic approach to find relevant research, following strict guidelines and assessing the quality of each study.What did the researchers find?Astronauts often experience muscle loss in the lower back, particularly in the lumbar spine.Space travel reduces the spine’s range of motion.There is a significant occurrence of disc herniations and disc dehydration.77% of astronauts report pain during space flights.47% experience acute pain after returning to Earth.33% suffer from chronic pain post-mission.What do these results mean?Our findings show that space travel can lead to serious spinal issues and a high risk of pain. These results highlight the need for better health strategies to protect astronauts during and after their missions. Understanding these effects is crucial for developing effective interventions and ensuring the well-being of space travelers.Keywords: chronic low back pain, space flight, physiological changes, microgravity

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: Méta-analyse
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,024
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0150,030
Bibliométrie0,0040,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,169
Tête enseignante GPT0,517
Écart entre enseignants0,348 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Même sujetSpaceflight effects on biologyTravaux en français237 207