MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6983605590

Nature, winter and architecture: a winter community on Manitoulin Island designed to provide benefits to the residents, landscape and island during the winter months

2021· dissertation· en· W6983605590 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLibrary Science and Administration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTourismPopulationVariety (cybernetics)Local communityClosing (real estate)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This thesis proposes the design of a community that focuses on architecture, and winter living
\non the landscapes of Manitoulin Island, Ontario. The proposed community aims to provide solutions
\nin direct response to the social and living challenges brought by the colder months, experienced
\nby permanent residents, summer residents, and tourists. In addition to providing benefits to the
\nusers, the solutions to these issues also aim to increase winter population and revitalize the Island
\nduring winter months. The question of my thesis is, How can the design of a community aid in
\nimproving the social and living challenges faced by residents and tourists, and revitalize
\nManitoulin Island during the winter months?
\nManitoulin Island’s landscapes are ideal for camping, boating, hiking, hunting, snowmobiling,
\nand other outdoor activities. Although the Island has a very successful tourism industry, it is still
\nsubject to issues experienced by residents and tourists during the colder months. Minimal focus is
\nput on winter living, resulting in a drastic decrease in winter population in contrast to the increase
\nseen during the summer. This decrease is due to the closing of local businesses and campgrounds
\nthat are not designed for year-round use in Northern Ontario, thus deterring people from visiting
\nduring these colder months.
\nThe primary programs that drive the proposed community are a network of trails, marina,
\nbeach, residential housing, a market centre, and a variety of social spaces and activities. These
\nprograms center around connecting with nature, living with the landscape, and creating a strong
\nsocial environment among residents and visitors. Most importantly, these programs are designed
\nto provide the visitors and residents of the community with activities and opportunities for a healthy
\nlifestyle during the winter months. The design of the community focuses on the individual human scale,
\nmiddle scale (larger gatherings of people), and the community scale, as well as the environmental
\nscale.
\nResearch presents an understanding of how people live with the landscape, ecosystem
\nservices, biophilic design, human needs, landscape needs, and how these are met, as well as how
\nboth humans and nature can coexist and benefit from each other. In designing the community,
\nattention is focused on how it is placed in the landscape, public and private space, circulation,
\nand how the design of the site influences the use of the community. A community that is able
\nto successfully implement these characteristics is campgrounds. Campgrounds are studied to
\ndetermine the patterns, physical layouts, social dynamics, demographics, and statistics that make
\nit successful. On Manitoulin Island, campgrounds have a diverse and strong social network while
\nencouraging respect for the environment; elements that this community hopes to achieve.
\n\t Manitoulin Island would significantly benefit from a residential community nestled within its
\nwinter landscape, designed to respectfully interact with the landscape during all seasons; offering
\nresidents year-round access and use to a place that provides lifelong social, ecological, and
\narchitectural benefits. A desired benefit of this community design proposal is for it to be highly
\nadaptable for locations throughout Northern Ontario and in other cold climates.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,574
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Même sujetLibrary Science and AdministrationTravaux en français237 207