The Ontario insolvency case. : in the Privy Council, Council Chamber, Whitehall, December 12th, 1893 : the attorney-general of Ontario vs. the attorney-general of Canada : argument of Mr. Blake of the appellant.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An Act respecting Assignments and Preferences byInsolvent Persons i.In case any person, being at the time in insolvent circumstances, or unable to pay his debts in full, or knowing himself to be on the eve of insolvency, voluntarily or by collusion with a creditor or creditors gives a confession of judgment, cognovit actionem, or warrant of attorney to confess judgment with intent, in giving such confession, cognovit actionem, or warrant of attorney, to confess judgment to defeat or delay his creditors wholly or in part or with intent thereby to give one or more of the creditors of any such person a preference over his other creditors, or over any one or more of such creditors, every such confession, cogno<'it actionem, or warrant of attorney to confess judgment shall be deemed and taken to be null and void as against the creditors of the party giving the same, and shall be invalid and ineffectual to support any judgment or writ of execution.2. Every gift, conveyance, assignment, or transfer, delivery over or payment of goods, chattels, or effects, or of bills, bonds, notes, securities, or of shares, dividends, premiums, or bonus in any bank, company, or corporation, or of any other property, real or personal, made by a person at a time when he is in insolvent circumstances, or is unable to pay his debts in full, or knows that he is on the eve of insolvency, with intent to defeat, delay, or prejudice his creditors, or to give to any one or more of them a preference over his other creditors, or over any one or more of them, or which has such effect, shall, as against them, be utterly void.3. (1) Nothing in the preceding section shall apply to any assignment made to the sheriff of the county in which the debtor resides or cariies on business, or to another assignee resident within the Province of Ontario, with the consent of the creditors as hereinafter provided, for the purpose of paying ratably and proportionately, and without preference or pri- ority, all the creditors of the debtor their just debts; nor to any /><>na Jide sale or payment made in the ordinary course of trade or calling to innocent purchasers or parties ; nor to any payment of money to a creditor, nor to any bona Jide gift, conveyance, assignment, transfer, or delivery over of any goods, securities, or property of any kind, as above mentioned, which is made in consideration of any present actual bona Jide payment in money, or by way of security for any present actual bona Jide advance of money, or which is made in consideration of any present actual bona Jide sale or delivery of goods or other property ; provided that the money paid, or the goods or other property sold or delivered, bear a fair and reasonable relative value to the consideration thereof.(2) Every assignment for the general benefit of ere i which is not void under section 2 of this Act, but is not made to the sheriff, nor to any other person with the prescribed consent of creditors, shall be void as against a subsequent assignment which is in conformity with this Act, and shall be subject in other respects to the provisions of this Act until and unless a subsequent assignment is executed in accordance with this Act.(5) The debtor may in the first place, with the consent of a majority of his creditors having claims of $100 and upwards computed according to the provisions of section 19, make a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors to person other than the sheriff, and residing in this province.4. Form of assignment for general benefit of creditors.5. How claims are to rank.6. Appointment of assignee.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,032 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,012 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».