MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6986197592

Osgoode Hall Law School Professor to Publish New Book on Corporate Board Diversity

2014· article· en· W6986197592 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublicationNorwegianCommissionDiversity (politics)Corporate governanceCorporate lawGender diversity
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Osgoode Hall Law School Professor to Publish New Book on Corporate Board Diversity\nTORONTO, November 17, 2014 – New research by Professor Aaron Dhir of York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School offers compelling insights into the role law can play in addressing the lack of gender diversity in corporate boardrooms.\nIn his forthcoming book, Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity, to be published by Cambridge University Press in February, Dhir analyses the homogeneity of corporate boards around the world and the two main ways in which law has been used to address this heated topic of debate. He compares the U.S. model of diversity disclosure with the Norwegian quota model, revealing stark contrasts.\nDhir examines the disclosures that the S&P 100 submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission after the SEC implemented a rule in 2010 requiring companies to report on whether they consider diversity in nominating directors. He finds that since the SEC provides no definition of the term “diversity,” corporations most frequently define the term with reference to a director’s prior experience rather than his or her socio-demographic characteristics. The SEC rule thus gives firms little reason to think seriously about the socio-demographic composition of their boards.\nBy contrast, Dhir’s study of the Norwegian quota model reveals a strategy that has produced very different results. Norway was the first country to enact a board diversity quota and today women in the country hold 40.5 percent of board positions. While speculation about the effects of corporate board quotas abounds, Dhir, who interviewed Norwegian corporate directors about their experiences under Norway’s controversial law, replaces the conjecture with an account of real-life boardroom reality.\n“The lack of gender parity in the governance of business corporations has ignited intense global debate, leading policymakers to wrestle with difficult questions that lie at the intersection of market activity and social identity politics,” said Dhir, who is currently a Visiting Professor of Law at Yale Law School.\n“Regulators globally are now debating what paths to pursue to diversify the upper echelons of their corporate sectors. Canada is no exception. Just last month, the Ontario Securities Commission and eight other provincial and territorial securities regulators announced new disclosure rules that will require Canadian firms to be more forthcoming about the inclusion of women in their governance structures. At the same time, a bill currently under consideration in the Canadian Senate seeks to mandate gender parity in corporate boardrooms.”\nDhir’s research findings are generating considerable media attention ahead of the publication of his book, including coverage in the New York Times, Forbes, and ThinkProgress. Journalists are welcome to access three preview chapters from the book, available for download here: \nhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2487149 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2488153 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2488154 \nDhir can be reached for comment at: adhir@osgoode.yorku.ca or aaron.dhir@yale.edu\n-30-\nYork University is helping to shape the global thinkers and thinking that will define tomorrow. York U’s unwavering commitment to excellence reflects a rich diversity of perspectives and a strong sense of social responsibility that sets us apart. A York U degree empowers graduates to thrive in the world and achieve their life goals through a rigorous academic foundation balanced by real-world experiential education. As a globally recognized research centre, York U is fully engaged in the critical discussions that lead to innovative solutions to the most pressing local and global social challenges. York U’s 11 faculties and 27 research centres are thinking bigger, broader and more globally, partnering with 288 leading universities worldwide. York U’s community is strong − 55,000 students, 7,000 faculty and staff, and more than 250,000 alumni.\nMedia Contact:\nVirginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,475
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeYLS (Yale Law School)Même sujetFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersTravaux en français237 207