The physical activity experiences of children with attention -deficit/hyperactivity disorder and movement difficulties
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) often experience challenges in physical activity (PA) behaviours due to their poor movement performances (Harvey et al., 2007) that may also overlap with movement behaviour disorders, like Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD; Sergeant, Piek, & Oosterlaan, 2006). The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the PA experiences of boys with ADHD who had a range of movement difficulties. It explored the good and not so good PA days of six boys with ADHD to gain a broader understanding of PA experiences from each child's perspective. The convenience sample of six boys with ADHD, 7-12 years, was recruited from an ADHD clinic at a provincial mental health university institute in Quebec, Canada. A sequential mixed-method research design was employed to understand the boys' PA experiences. First, two quantitative movement skill assessment tests, Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Test of Gross Motor Development-Second Edition (TGMD-2), were administered. The boys were categorized into two groups, based on the results from the MABC-2 test scores. Three boys were placed into the Amber/Red (A/R)-Zone group (i.e., "at risk" of having DCD or movement difficulties) and three boys were placed into the Green (G)-Zone group (i.e., no movement difficulties). The TGMD-2 scores showed that both groups demonstrated poor fundamental movement skills. This finding was expected for the A/R-Zone group but not for the G-Zone group. A new qualitative, visual research method, called the storybook-telling interview technique, was also created for this pilot study. The method enabled child-friendly, semi-structured PA interviews to be conducted with each participant. Within- and between-case analyses were performed during thematic analyses. Five themes emerged from the interview: Activity, Knowledge, Self-Awareness, Other People and Interview. Both groups shared similar experiences because they related positive feelings about performing specific movement skills and playing with family and friends during PA. A few differences were also present. The boys in the A/R-Zone group experienced asocial behaviours from their peers (e.g., exclusion) whereas the boys in the G-Zone group spoke about building rapport with peers during PA. This is the first qualitative study to concurrently explore the PA experiences of children with ADHD/DCD (e.g. A/R-Zone group) and ADHD (e.g., G-Zone group). It is hoped that this pilot study will lead to more research studies in this area to encourage all children with ADHD to lead a healthy and active lifestyle in the long term.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».