(Re)thinking public school architecture as a pedagogical tool
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis aims to rethink elementary public-school architecture by exploring its \nability to become an influential aspect of the pedagogical process in schools. As \neducational paradigms have historically responded to social, political, and cultural \nconditions, it appears that the development of educational paradigms has moved \nfaster than the educational buildings of the 21st century. Paradoxically, the spatial \nconditions of educational architecture seem to be stuck in the 19th century. \nAlthough there are notable school buildings that emerged from the 20th and \n21st century that challenge a conventional school model, the existence of a gap \nbetween school architecture and pedagogical paradigms is predominant in the North \nAmerican context. \nBeginning with an investigation of the current spatial conditions of educational \narchitecture, specifically in North America, this thesis analyzes the relationship \nbetween school buildings and pedagogical paradigms that draw upon the history \nof education and its built institutions. As well, it examines the factors that prevent \nsuch correlation. Relevant building typologies were studied through orthographic \ndrawings to create a visual comparison of school buildings from the 19th century \nto today. This allows us to observe the major spatial transformations that occurred \nbetween school models over time. Additionally, the analysis addresses how the \nsocial, economic, and political factors influence the relationship between the design \nof learning environments and the shift in educational paradigms, uncovering the \nprinciples of school designs and identifying clear discontinuities between the built \nforms and educational models. Undoubtedly, most of the contemporary educational \nbuildings present in the North American context manifest spatial traditions that bear \nfew relations to the current knowledge of the learning processes. \nConsidering the significant role of the learning environment in the support of critical \nthinking, discovery, and creativity, this thesis explores this potential to overcome \ncentury-old traditions of learning through memorization and subservience to the \nauthority of the teacher. We use the context of Markham, Ontario, in the Greater \nToronto Area, to create an elementary school based on the principles seen in \nMontessori’s, Reggio Emilia Schools, and Lab Ecole projects, which respond to the \nbasis of the most actual theories of children education. The designs we see today \nof newly constructed school buildings within the suburban context tend to be \nan afterthought, prioritizing budget, and fast construction rates with little to no \nconsideration to how the built environment can aid in the learning process. As a \nresult, the suburbs provide an ideal setting to explore how the physical environment \ncan aid in the learning process. Ultimately, using architecture as a pedagogical \ntool that prompts the physical environment to inspire, stimulate, and encourage \nexploration and investigation of new ideas while supporting collaboration and the \ndevelopment of connections beyond the typical school environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».