MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6987521042

Telling Stories About Indigeneity and Canadian Sport: The Spectacular Cree & Ojibway Indian Hockey Barnstorming Tour of North America, 1928

2009· article· en· W6987521042 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of international women's studies · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChampionshipAmateurIce hockeySpectacleFootballCharterAlbatross
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In January and February 1928, 14 hockey-playing Natives from northeastern Ontario undertook a celebrated barnstorming tour of 17 cities and towns in the United States and Canada. Traveling by charter bus, the “Cree & Ojibway Indian Hockey Tour” was a well-promoted and cleverly-planned road trip that began in North Bay and swung through southwestern Ontario before it reached its real targets: Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. In some cities, the players divided themselves into two “tribes,” the Cree versus the Ojibways, and held out their game as part of a series for the “Indian Hockey Championship of Canada.” In other locations, only one team was put on the ice to face a local side. In every place, the Native teams wore buckskin “jerseys” with fringes and (in warmup) ceremonial headdresses made of feathers. Invariably, the pre-game hype oversold the real product that the natives put on the ice, but the spectacle was more important than the quality of the hockey played. This tour was unique. While barnstorming was a celebrated feature of American baseball and football in the 1920s and 30s, it was rarely done in hockey. Moreover, though individual First Nations players were sprinkled through amateur and minor-pro hockey in these years, teams made up wholly of natives were virtually unknown. In almost every city they visited, the Cree and Ojibway games were received generously (though not wholly uncritically) by the local press. Pre- and post-game articles were often long and detailed and accompanied by photographs. Still, there was remarkable variation in the stories. As Michael Oriard has written about early football in the U.S., the sporting press in the early 20th-century did much more than merely report the facts of sports matches. To sell newspapers writers created a variety of “narrative plots” that taught audiences to “read sports as powerful cultural texts.” Newspaper coverage of sporting events was a form of popular drama that emphasized dominant cultural myths. Even the dullest game could be imbued with meanings drawn from tensions of modern life (science vs. brawn; order vs. chaos; civilized vs. savage). Reportage on the Cree and Ojibway games can be read in this way. This essay argues that sportwriters created three alternate (and sometimes contrasting) narratives to tell the story of the Cree-Ojibway hockey games. First, in some locations, the Indian barnstorming tour was cast as a clever exercise in modern enterprise. These natives (all of whom were reportedly summer fishing guides in northern Ontario resorts) used new technology in communications to sell to southern Ontarians and Americans their “products”: hockey, and northern tourism. A second narrative described ice hockey as an authentically indigenous game, a sport first played by northern Natives that was now being re-appropriated in this colorful tour. Headdresses, buckskin jerseys and invented players names (i.e “Tomahawk”) confirmed the aboriginal nature of the game. The story of these games was the story of a game played in its pristine form. Finally, some sportswriters saw the tour for what some of the players must have believed it to be – a subversive self-parody; a northern, wintry version of blackface minstrelsy. In other words, the Cree-Ojibway tour was a drama of racial mockery and power inversion. In dressing up and acting as “imaginary Indians,” these natives were “having a laugh” at their paying customers’ expense. Put together, these narratives reveal much about the social construction of hockey, race and nation in the 1920s and compose an interesting episode in the social history of Canadian-American relations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,088
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,636

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0650,016
Communication savante0,0110,004
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of international women's studiesMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207