MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6987783175

Understanding and Prediction of Thermohydraulic Phenomena Relevant to Supercritical Water Cooled Reactors (SCWRs) - Final Report of a Coordinated Research Project

2020· other· en· W6987783175 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · 2020
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSupercritical fluidCoolantThermal hydraulicsBenchmark (surveying)Heat transferHeat exchangerHigh pressureWater cooled
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FOREWORD 
\nThe supercritical water cooled reactor (SCWR) is an innovative concept that operates at a pressure 
\nhigher than the thermodynamic critical point of water, allowing the core outlet coolant temperature 
\nto be much higher than that of the current generation of WCRs. The key technological advantages 
\nof the SCWR include its high thermal efficiency and simplified system configuration compared 
\nwith conventional WCRs. 
\nThere has been a high level of interest in research and development of SCWRs in several Member 
\nStates. In 2007, the IAEA started the coordinated research project (CRP) entitled Heat Transfer 
\nBehaviour and Thermo-hydraulics Code Testing for Super-critical Water Cooled Reactors 
\n(SCWRs), which promoted international collaboration among 16 institutes from 9 Member States 
\nand 2 international organizations. The CRP was successfully completed in September 2012. 
\nInformation generated from that CRP was documented in numerous IAEA publications and reports. 
\nA database of thermohydraulic parameters of interest to SCWR development was compiled and is 
\nhoused in the Nuclear Energy Agency’s central server. 
\nAfter the completion of the CRP, collaboration continued between several participating institutes. 
\nMost of these institutes expressed their strong interest in and support for a new CRP on 
\nthermohydraulics of SCWRs to continue the momentum of international collaboration. The overall 
\nobjective of this second CRP, which started in 2014, was to improve the understanding of 
\nthermohydraulic phenomena and the prediction accuracy of thermohydraulic parameters related to 
\nSCWRs and to benchmark numerical toolsets for SCWR thermohydraulic analyses. Scientific 
\ninvestigators from participating institutes identified specific research objectives to improve the 
\npredictive capability of key technology areas (e.g. heat transfer and pressure drop for SCWR fuel 
\nrelated geometries, parallel channel stability boundary, natural circulation flow, critical heat flux at 
\nnear critical pressures, critical flow, subchannel and plenum mixing). The predictive capability of 
\nsubchannel codes and computational fluid dynamic tools was assessed through benchmarking 
\nexercises for heat transfer in tubes, annuli and bundles as well as pressure drops in annuli and 
\nbundles. In total, 12 institutes from 10 Member States and 2 international organizations were 
\ninvolved in this second CRP, which was completed with the planned outputs in 2019. 
\nThe present publication provides the background and objectives of the CRP; descriptions of a 
\nrevised Canadian SCWR design concept and a new SCWR design concept being developed at the 
\nNuclear Power Institute of China; updated information on key technology areas (e.g. heat transfer 
\nin simple geometries, stability and critical flow) obtained since the completion of the previous CRP; 
\nnew experiments and data on supercritical heat transfer in bundles and on critical heat flux; and 
\napplication of the direct numerical simulation approach for supercritical heat transfer. Results of 
\nthree benchmarking exercises with subchannel codes and computational fluid dynamic tools are 
\nalso presented, to demonstrate successes and show areas for further improvement. Experimental 
\ninformation and data were contributed by participating institutes through close collaboration. 
\nThis publication illustrates the state of the art of SCWR research and development. It is expected 
\nto be a key supporting publication for researchers and engineers pursuing the development of 
\nSCWRs or equipment/components operating at supercritical pressures. 
\nThe IAEA is grateful for the contributions of the chief scientific investigators of all participating 
\ninstitutes and of the CRP chairpersons, L. Leung (Canada) and W. Ambrosini (Italy). In particular, 
\nthe efforts of L. Leung to collect and organize the contributions and to continuously encourage 
\nprogress in the work are gratefully recognized. The IAEA officers responsible for this publication 
\nwere T. Jevremovic and K. Yamada of the Division of Nuclear Power.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,912
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,308
Tête enseignante GPT0,352
Écart entre enseignants0,045 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)Travaux en français237 207