MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6988035554

Women and job satisfaction in today's Canadian armed forces' climate

2019· article· en· W6988035554 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender, Security, and Conflict
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConfidentialityExpatriateQualitative researchJob satisfactionPerceptionHonourTokenismQuality (philosophy)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Women have struggled throughout history in order to integrate successfully into the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). This research examined the cultural experiences of non-commissioned female members in male-dominated, non-combat arms occupations. Women’s historical to present-day service was examined and compared to other para-military organizations within Canada and other countries. Implications were also explored regarding strategies to recruit and retain women in the CAF and improve their quality of life within the organization.\n\n\t\tThis qualitative study consisted of interviews of ten CAF members who identified as female and were serving in the ranks of Corporal to Sergeant. To this end, the primary research question was as follows: “What are the experiences of females who are currently serving, and who have previously served, in predominantly male-dominated, non-commissioned, non-combat arms trades?” The volunteers for this study were interviewed in a one-on-one confidential setting and were asked 6 preliminary questions, 16 main questions, 5 additional questions regarding the CAF’s Operation HONOUR initiative, and 1 final question.\n\n\t\tFour main themes resulted from the data: motivation, elemental differences, navigating gender, and the impressions of Operation HONOUR. Congruency of interests, skills, and experience strongly influenced job satisfaction, and 50% of the participants indicated that they would have selected a different occupation when enrolling in the organization. Despite instances of tokenism and harassing language and behaviours directed at the servicewomen throughout their careers, poor leadership in general and difficulties with overly competitive serving members had been the primary reasons for two members to consider exiting the organization. Job satisfaction was linked primarily to the perception of being provided challenging, interesting, and fulfilling work. Direct or indirect support from superiors and peers were also factors that related to job satisfaction.\n\n\t\tPostings and their associated environments of Army, Navy, or Air Force strongly influenced the women’s personal and professional experiences, with the Navy and Army being associated more closely with overall more misogynist treatment of women. The women navigated their gender in numerous ways in order to succeed, with most problems stemming from pregnancy and child care, and managing heavily physically demanding tasks. Male-to-male interactions were described as more physical and easygoing, cross-sex interactions were complex and varied but most often related to discrimination against females because of pregnancy and child care, and female-to-female interactions were described as extremes of either camaraderie to counteract male peer interactions or highly competitive and counter-productive. Female superiors in particular were mostly described in a highly negative manner, compared to male superiors.\n\n\t\tAll of the servicewomen were very familiar with the Operation HONOUR initiative, and although they recognized that a problem of sexual harassment existed within the CAF, they attributed it to only a few perpetrators. Of these women, 90% believed that Operation HONOUR has made a positive difference, although 50% believed that it is has been implemented in too extreme a manner, and comments also included ways in which it has made their daily functioning more difficult because of servicemen’s retaliation to the initiative. Suggestions were made regarding Operation HONOUR to improve leadership, and to elicit feedback on a one-on-one versus group-oriented setting.\n\n\t\tBased on the study’s findings, recommendations for practice are provided to improve the quality of life of all serving members, from a recruiting standpoint via the CAF’s recruiting website to programs to orient women more fully to the CAF and its occupations. For those members who are currently serving, mandatory and consistent mentorship and leadership training are recommended, particularly regarding leading and assessing others, and managing instances of inappropriate conduct. Additional recommendations are made to counteract the difficulties of those members who are pregnant, on parental leave, or caring for their children. Suggestions are also made to counteract the problems associated with group-oriented reporting on the success of Operation HONOUR and making decisions when encountering harassment-related behaviours. The recommendations for further research respond to the limitations of the current study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,040
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,290

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,004
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,195
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Même sujetGender, Security, and ConflictTravaux en français237 207