Welfare Mines : Extraction and Development in Postwar Northern Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The role of extractive industries in development outcomes is a contested matter. The unresolved, provocative nature of modern mines, and in particular, of the industry’s self-positioning as an engine of local or regional improvement raises difficult problems for territorial, political, economic, cultural, and ontological sovereignty, in part because of the deeply hegemonic position it has assumed. This thesis broadly examines the interaction between two distinct but interrelating areas of development – resources extraction and human welfare – in northern Canada since the postwar period. I examine this question by following ideas and politics governing peoples and mines, and I explain how theories and practices of development evolved and intervened via industrial mining and the labour of Indigenous miners in northern Canada from 1945 up to the present. I present the results as a historical geography of state policy where mineral exploitation and human development intersect. Through a historical analysis grounded in a critical review of literature and the archival record, I consider economic progress and the closely linked mineral frontier advancement within Canada’s Arctic and subarctic regions, according to five periods: I Necessary interventions (1948–57); II Program for human betterment (1957–62); III Alternative development (1959–67); IV The dual economy (1968–84); and V Towards sustainable mines (1982–2005). Throughout this study, I adopt a comparative method in which I select multiple case examples that can, as a cumulative force, yield explanatory power. I do not conceive of the chosen industrial or mine sites as in-depth studies in their own right, but instead as part of a constellation of places that can serve to zoom in and out in order to cover a larger geographic unit spanning the Canadian north. A historical reconceptualization and a historicization of northern mines as locales of welfare making has revealed their ambiguous potential in bringing forth a radical transformation of peoples, lands, and societies in Canada. The pledge to improve societies based on the profitable exploitation of mineral resources arguably worked in lockstep with the delivery of large-scale mining to northern Canada; a double program I have come to view as the building of welfare mines. This thesis demonstrates that the welfare mines remain important sites where the apparent tension between money and peoples is used productively by the state. They are real-world places, material holes in the ground where mineral wealth is extracted but also where humans are reshaped, where both phenomena are inextricably woven within the overall rubric of development finally used to serve colonial governments. Welfare, insofar as it interacts with industrial development, participates, enables, is how mining capitalism works – welfare and exploitation necessarily coexist at northern mines. The welfare mines not only opened new possibilities in the north, they also served to foreclose other paths, thereby benefiting the mines in a self-reinforcing cycle. It is an all-embracing force that was not meant to be contained or to coincide with diverse modes of production or means of living. This is the power of welfare mines, a social power that illuminates the broader welfare mechanics of colonial power in northern Canada, and beyond.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».