“you are part of the river, even if you have forgotten it”: The Politics of River Writing in Contemporary Indigenous and Canadian Literatures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
My dissertation examines the complex and layered representations of rivers within Contemporary Canadian and Indigenous literatures, revealing the important intersection between rivers, ecocriticism, and Indigenous cultural resurgence. Using criticism by scholars such as Leanne Simpson, Glen Coulthard, and Astrida Neimanis, I examine the different positionalities and voices at the heart of primary texts such as Katherena Vermette’s river woman, Rita Wong’s undercurrent, and Christine Stewart’s Treaty 6 Deixis. Moving between Indigenous, European settler, and diasporic writers currently living on the lands known as Canada, I investigate the practice of ethical allyship and the important connection between literature and life, or art and praxis. As such, my work is just as concerned with politics, and emphasizing the ambitions for decolonial praxis central to many of the works, as it is with examining more conventional literary aspects of river writing. My thesis situates various urgent literary and political issues and focalizes these concerns within the site of Canadian rivers. By putting these texts in conversation, I analyze rivers and their relationships to broader political, cultural, and literary discourses such as second-wave ecocriticism’s preoccupation with incorporating Indigenous knowledges and their sustainable relationships to the land into contemporary environmentalism; decolonization and its re-situation into original political and cultural contexts; the water crisis and the physical and cultural centrality of water to both Indigenous and settler cultures; and contemporary Indigenous Cultural resurgence. Ultimately, cultural representations of rivers reveal that decolonization is inextricably bound to any movement toward ecological sustainability. My dissertation treats the rivers that I discuss as both real—physical, geographical, chemical, environmental, tangible—and symbolic—metaphorical, symbolic, cultural, spiritual, abstracted, theoretical. By keeping a consistent focus on cultural positionalities in my analysis of these texts and their relationship to systems of power, I contend that rivers are a complex literary site because they are important to Indigenous, settler, and diasporic cultures. As such, I determine that rivers are not only a key environmental concern, but they also represent a key dialogic space since they are central to the cultural and social narratives of Indigenous Peoples and settlers alike. Ultimately, I argue that understanding rivers through a more nuanced, non-western, and decolonial lens can help facilitate opportunities for environmentally sustainable and socially just futures. Guided by words like those from Fred Wah, who says “you are part of the river, even if you have forgotten it,” my project seeks to expose the ways in which examining our relationships to rivers can help to create decolonial and sustainable futures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,076 | 0,072 |
| Communication savante | 0,025 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».