戦後日本における高等教育関連議員の構造分析 <論考>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aims of this paper are 1) to identify the politicians (Diet members) who played important roles in higher education in post-war Japan; 2) to examine their social characteristics and (3) to investigate the patterns of their influence in the political structure of higher education and in policy making decisions. \n\nThe study identified the 376 Diet members who made statements in that body’s educational subcommittees from 1945 to 2012. Moreover, these 376 Diet members were divided into three groups ― “core,” “middle,” and “peripheral” ― in rank order of the number of their pronouncements, and their social characteristics were analyzed. \n\nThe analysis yielded the following results: \n\n1) More than half of the core group were born between 1925-1934 and belong in the generation growing up during World War II. \n\n2) Many of core group were from big cities. On the other hand, in the peripheral group, many of them were from Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu and Okinawa areas. \n\n3) Almost half of the core group in the House of Councilors were Socialist Party of Japan (SPJ) members and 30% of them were Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) members. On the other hand, more than 60% of the core group in the House of Representatives were LDP members. The pattern and process of discussions were different between both houses. \n\n4) A quarter of the members of the core group in the House of Councilors were graduates from normal schools under the old system. In the House of Representatives, many of them were graduates from The University of Tokyo and other national and public universities. \n\n5) In the House of Councilors, about 30% of each group majored in pedagogy. In the House of Representatives, many of them majored in law and economics. \n\n6) In the House of Councilors, almost half of the core group were union members (the Japan Teachers Union). In the House of Representatives, many were members of the local assemblies, and many of the core group was ex-bureaucrats. \n\nAs above, the political actors who participated in the post war educational policy were not uniformed. This means that a variety of ideas and discussions had been presented in policy making and decisions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».