April 24 2024- Family Gets Ambulance And Clean-up Bills, But No Answers After Cop Shooting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The shooting of Brad Singer by Winnipeg police, and the effect of his death on his family, is the topic of Episode 40. The Singer family are trying to raise financial support for the sudden and significant costs they have had to bear, as you'll hear in this podcast - the link to donate is https://www.givesendgo.com/bradsinger Part 1- Gerry Singer joins the podcast to discuss his brother Brad falling into mental illness, and the medical and prescription history that led to police trying to haul Bradley Singer into custody for a mental health examination. In particular Gerry notes the difference between how cops used to handle Brad in the past, and the fact he was never charged with a violent crime, with the SWAT-style raid on February 14. He explains how Brad, previously diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, started spiraling in October and became withdrawn. He was taken in by police for an examination in January, causing thousands of dollars in damage to the Magnus Avenue home. You'll hear how the medical system interacted with Brad after he departed the hospital. 16.35 - "Then about a week and a half later these IIU people come to my residence and tell me that Brad was involved in - they called it an altercation - with police officers and he's been shot several times." Supposedly Brad was taken into surgery - but what the family was told at HSC raised a red flag. "I couldn't believe they shot him dead executing a mental health warrant... it's so unnecessary for this to happen." If you have Story Tips, Comments, or want to financially support our reporting via Interac -Email: martygoldlive@gmail.com 21:12 Part 2 Hear us review the ?details of the shooting compiled by the Black Rod blog,? which described other recent cases where gun-toting felons barricaded inside homes were not shot. Apprehending a 59 year old mental health patient needed lethal force? Gerry Singer took part in a press conference with their attorney, watch it at this link ! Gerry says IIU told the family they could not see the body, or be told if police at the scene had tasers that could have been used instead of bullets, because it would somehow interfere with their investigation. He questions how the confrontation was handled, what ' a large edged weapon' meant - insisting his brother did not owned a machete or large knives - and why a crew of 9 Tactical unit cops wearing body armour thought Brad was a danger to them. As the Black Rod wrote: "The only legal reason for shooting him to death was if he was a threat to somebody. To whom?" Join Our ???? Facebook Group ??? On X/Twitter ???@TGCTS??? 30:30 - "They left this huge puddle of his blood there... I'm not sure he made it to the hospital alive." The mystery of why non-lethal tactics like tasers, were seemingly not considered haunts the family. They're calling for an inquest. "The truth would be nice." You'll also hear how the entire Black Rod site was - without explanation - blocked from the Internet within days of their post stating a jury trial, and not the IIU, should determine if the police crossed the line into criminal conduct by shooting Brad Singer and killing him. Why were they censored? 38.20 - Gerry Singer sums up the family's concerns, how their lawyer's inquiries have not been acknowledged, how they received an ambulance bill, and were tricked into footing the bill for boarding up the house damaged by cops. As Marty Gold points out, the police complain about derelict housing but then created a derelict house by bashing out the doors - and afterwards a grieving family was expected to clean up their brother's puddle of blood on the floor and seal the home from looters. For PayPal donations to defray costs for TGCTS, use our Donate Page
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,105 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».