The Association between Religious Participation and Social Isolation in Canadian Middle-and Older-aged Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social isolation is a modifiable risk factor for poor health outcomes, including cognitive decline, cardiovascular disease, and mental illness. Thus, researchers seek to identify exposures that are inversely associated with social isolation itself. Religious participation may be one such exposure because research has shown it to be positively associated with social support and social integration, two concepts related to decreases in social isolation. However, the association between religious participation and social isolation has not been investigated in depth. The objective of this thesis was to examine the association between religious participation and social isolation using baseline and three-year follow-up data from the Comprehensive Cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). The CLSA is an ongoing prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults who were between 45 and 85 years old at recruitment. \nReligious participation was measured via a single question, asking participants how often they participated in religious activities over the past 12 months (e.g., services, committees, choirs). Responses were recorded on a 5-point scale ranging from “at least once a day” to “never”, which served as the reference category in regression modeling. Social isolation was measured with an index computed by Menec et al., which tabulated the absence of social interactions, relationships, and a lack of participation in community activities, as well as included retirement status and marital status. Social isolation index scores ranged from 0 to 5 and were dichotomized into “socially isolated” or “not socially isolated”. Multiple logistic regression was used for the analysis. Follow-up social isolation index scores were regressed onto baseline religious participation responses while controlling for baseline social isolation, sociodemographic variables, health variables, and functional social support. The fully adjusted model was stratified by age groups and sex separately. \n\tThe analytical sample comprised 22,139 participants. Approximately 50% of participants participated in religious activities at least once a year. At baseline, 7% of participants were socially isolated, and 6% were socially isolated at follow-up. \n\tRegression models indicated small and inverse associations between religious participation and social isolation over three years; however, none of the results were statistically significant (α = 0.05), thereby suggesting the possibility of positive associations. The results did not identify any effect modification by age groups and sex. \n\tMost CLSA participants were not socially isolated, which contributed to the non-significant and small associations between religious participation and social isolation. Longer follow-ups of the CLSA sample and a larger proportion of socially isolated individuals are needed to assess this association further.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».