MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6989941723

The complete blood count and caninemast cell tumor. A retrospective survey in a veterinary teaching hospital in Tuscany, Italy

2017· article· en· W6989941723 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVeterinary Oncology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Puglia
Mots-clésComplete blood countStage (stratigraphy)Bone marrowCytopeniaBiopsyBlood countPalpationLymph nodeRetrospective cohort studyOdds ratio
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Complete blood count (CBC) modifications in canine mast cell tumor (cMCT) are described in dogs showing
\nbone marrow involvement. However, few data are available for dogs affected by MCT in other stages than
\nstage IV MCTs [1-2].
\nThe aims of this study were: 1- to investigate the frequency of cMCT in a Veterinary Teaching Hospital
\n(VTH) of Tuscany, Italy; 2- to assess if breed, gender and sexual status were associated with the frequency
\nof cMCT; 3- to evaluate the association between each CBC parameters and clinical variables in cMCT.
\nDogs with cyto/histological diagnosis of cutaneous MCT were enrolled. All dogs were staged with
\nabdominal ultrasound and 3-view chest X-rays. Fine-needle biopsy of the regional lymph node (LN) was
\nperformed if LN was palpable or seen at ultrasonography. Fine-needle biopsy of liver and spleen was
\nperformed in high-risk MCT (relapsing MCT, inguinal/perineal MCT, large or ulcerated MCT, Patnaik GIII or
\nKiupel high-grade MCT, presence of nodal metastasis), and if ultrasonography alterations were detected or
\nif requested by clinicians. Bone marrow cytology was performed in IV-stage MCT and if severe peripheral
\nblood cytopenia was found. To investigate frequency of cMCT, dogs with MCT have been selected from our
\nVTH database. To assess breed, gender and sexual status specific frequencies in cMCT, Odds Ratio (OR) with
\nmatched dogs without MCT (n. 13,077) in our VTH database has been performed. Dogs were divided in
\nthese subgroups: neutered (30)/intact (68), male (47)/female (51), age based on the 25th-, 50th- and 75thpercentile,
\npresence of ulceration (15/89), occurrence of LN (28/88), occurence of visceral metastasis
\n(12/88), and clinical stage (5 stage 0, 26 stage I, 8 stage II, 37 stage III, 12 stage IV). Each single parameter of
\nCBC was used as an independent variable and analyzed statistically for each subgroup of dogs (t-student or
\nif appropriate Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests).
\nFrequency of cMCT was 0.77% (98/13,175). Among purebreds, Boxer (OR 7.2), Pitt Bull (OR 5.4), French
\nBulldog (OR 4.4) and Labrador Retriever (OR 2.6) were considered the most predominant. Neutered dogs
\nwere also predominant compared to intact dogs (OR 2.1). Up to 67% (66/98) patients had CBC results in the
\nreference ranges. The most common CBC abnormalities were anemia (25%) and leukocytosis/penia (17%).
\nAny hematological abnormalities were not significantly different when analyzed for sex, age, presence of
\nulceration, occurrence of lymph node or visceral metastasis, and clinical stage.
\nThese findings suggest that some breeds and the neutered status could be at increased frequency for
\ncMCT. As all dogs came from a small area of Italy, a comprehensive examination of inbreeding and gene
\ncode associated with cMCT development could suggest a genetic predisposition. As reported in the
\nliterature, many dogs with MCT show CBC results in the reference ranges. Any single hematological variable
\nwas not associated with specific clinical findings or disease stage, suggesting a minimal role of CBC in the
\noverview of cMCT.
\n[1] Endicott MM, Charney SC, McKnight JA, et al. Clinicopathological findings and results of bone marrow aspiration in
\ndogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours: 157 cases (1999-2002). Vet Comp Oncol. 2007;5(1):31-37. [2] Marconato L,
\nBettini G, Giacoboni C, et al. Clinicopathological features

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)Même sujetVeterinary Oncology ResearchTravaux en français237 207