Developing a unified framework of reading and attention through attentional-oculomotor exercise and cognitive neuroscience examinations of frontal-eye-field structure and function
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reading is a cognitive skill that involves integrating multiple processes. One of these processes is attention, but the theoretical models of reading and attention are typically considered separately. Given the role of attention in successful reading, and research that suggests attention is affected in dyslexia, this thesis proposes a unified framework of reading + attention to better understand how these cognitive processes work together, with a focus on the attentional process of oculomotor activity. \nExperiment 1 developed a novel approach to isolate orthographic lexical decision processing and a gaming-style health bar task to manipulate attentional-oculomotor exercise. Through manipulation of stimulus location, Experiment 1 suggested peripheral attentional-oculomotor exercise was more beneficial to reading performance than central attentional-oculomotor exercise, supporting recent theories of oculomotor activity in reading. Experiments 2 and 3 further developed this paradigm, and observed benefits of both peripheral and central attentional-oculomotor exercise on reading suggesting fine-grained oculomotor processes may also play a role in the reading + attention relationship. All three of these studies observed word frequency of lexical targets was associated with improved performance in the lexical decision task while bigram frequency of sublexical foils was associated with worse performance, which will be a useful measure for future studies that are attempting to isolate these processes.\nExperiment 4 used data from a hybrid reading and attention fMRI experiment to localize the interaction between reading and attention in the frontal-eye-field – a region involved in oculomotor activity. An interaction in fMRI activation was observed in the frontal-eye-field, supporting theories of the region’s involvement in reading and attention. The frontal-eye-field region of interest identified in Experiment 4 was used in Experiment 5 to identify the connectivity profile of the frontal-eye-field with other reading + attention regions. Connections with the basal ganglia, cerebellum, and superior parietal lobule were highlighted, which are implicated across a number of components in the reading and attention networks. \nUsing these findings as a framework, a combined model of reading + attention was proposed to serve as a foundation for future research on reading + attention. The findings will have implications in both the research fields of reading and attention, as well as applications in the development of reading interventions for dyslexia, which can benefit from attentional-oculomotor exercise.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».