Eating in response to emotions: Alexithymia, emotional eating, and associated psychological mechanisms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The overarching objective was to elucidate the relationship between alexithymia and eating in response to emotions. First, a systematic review synthesised the findings of nine eligible articles, providing preliminary evidence for a positive association between alexithymia and self-reported emotional eating. As the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ-EE) was the subjective emotional eating measure most frequently used by previous research, it became the subject of an exploratory ‘think aloud’ study. This study audio-recorded participants’ spoken aloud thoughts as they completed the DEBQ-EE online. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted to further explore alexithymia and emotional eating using other self-report measures (Emotional Eating Scale [EES] and Salzburg Emotional Eating Scale [SEES]) and identify mechanisms for potential intervention targets. Findings indicated an indirect relationship between alexithymia and emotional eating (EES) via emotion dysregulation, and subsequently a positive conditional indirect effect whereby greater emotion dysregulation and greater self-compassion interacted, leading to greater emotional eating (EES). It was concluded that neither emotion dysregulation nor self-compassion would be appropriate targets for emotional eating interventions. The construct of ‘feeling fat’ was introduced, considered to be a proxy description used when individuals are otherwise unable to identify/describe their negative feelings, and associated with unfavourable outcomes. Existing literature is largely situated within clinical contexts, despite presence within general populations, offering an opportunity to design a brief intervention to test whether encouraging identification and description of feelings would lead to reduced state sensations of feeling fat, within the general population. The findings of the study were unexpected, as despite no significant difference in change scores across groups, the control condition elicited the greatest mean reduction in feeling fat compared to the intervention conditions. A gap in the literature examining the relationship between self-compassion and feeling fat was also examined in this final study, providing preliminary support for an inverse relationship between the traits.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».