Effects of the Deposition of Various Fines during Hydrotreating of a Bitumen Derived Gas Oil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The processing and upgrading of the Canadian Athabasca Oil Sands is necessary to meet the demands of a growing global economy in a world of diminishing reserves. As such, the reduction in operating costs is imperative to further increase the amount of economically feasible reserves. Hydrotreating is a secondary upgrading method which, at elevated temperatures and pressures in the presence of hydrogen and a catalyst, removes contaminants from the oil stream. This both improves the quality of the produced oil by increasing the H/C ratio and allows the contaminants to be processed at the upgrading facility rather than be vented as exhaust. The purpose of this research was to compare the different types of fine particles that enter an industrial hydrotreating unit within a controlled setting. By comparing the catalyst activity and pressure buildup between mineral fines (namely kaolinite, montmorillonite, and pyrite), produced solids (petroleum coke), and corrosion products (iron (III) oxide), it was hoped that any discovered differences could be exploited through optimization of reactor conditions to lessen the quantity and/or impact of their fouling. This was performed using a laboratory-scale continuous-flow packed bed reactor, which is similar to the equipment used industrially. By comparing the pressure profiles during accelerated fines deposition of the different types of fines, it was found that mineral fines would create the earliest pressure buildup, taking 7-10 days and having a maximum pressure growth of 2885 kPa. The expected mechanism for these fines is that the surrounding asphaltene layers would desorb under hydrotreating conditions, leaving behind the minerals that were not oil-wetting, and couldn’t be carried by the passing oil stream. As more of these minerals were left behind, flow channels were blocked, and a filter cake formed at the inlet of the reactor. The second category of fines to result in pressure buildup was petroleum coke, reaching a 1193 kPa pressure drop. The mechanism driving this is that, as the petroleum coke solids break apart, any heavy metals that were contained within are left behind on the packing. This leads to the formation of a filter cake overtop of the catalyst bed. The category that took the longest for pressure to appear was corrosion products, where it was found that Fe_2 O_3 was converting to FeS under hydrotreating conditions. This formed FeS was then fouling the reactor system. This took over 40 days to be observed, with a final reactor differential pressure of 336 kPa. In analyzing the conversion of nitrogen and sulphur within the oil stream for each experiment, it was found that catalyst deactivation due to fouling was minimal, with the main impact to hydrotreater performance being due to the pressure buildup. The one exception to this was for the iron (III) oxide experiment, where the formed FeS improved catalyst activity. However, a significant amount of iron deposition was required to achieve the same benefits as the cobalt or nickel promotors that are typically impregnated onto the catalysts during preparation. Finally, through analysis of the textural and surface properties of the catalysts before and after the fouling had occurred, it was determined that fouling only occurred along the outer surface of the catalysts, and none of the active sites within the pores were reached. This is primarily due to the relative size between the foulants and the catalyst pores. Catalyst specific surface area was between 140-148 m2/g for all samples. Future research into this area should focus on optimizing reactor conditions to increase the period until pressure buildup occurs, as this is the first issue that a hydrotreater will experience due to the fouling of fine particles. Additionally, any research into possible methods for the removal of the asphaltene layer and filtration of the mineral fines prior to entering the hydrotreater could be considered as another avenue by which the reactor life cycle can be extended.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».