Esther Brandeau / Jacques La Fargue: Performing a Reading of an Eighteenth Century Multicrosser
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How can we research and retell colonial era stories of transgression in service of queer, feminist and decolonial worldmaking? This dissertation argues for deploying multiple genres of research practice to answer this question. The argument is performed through attention to the case of Esther Brandeau / Jacques La Fargue, known as the first, or among the first Jewish people to arrive to Canada. They did so in 1738 as a purportedly female Jewish subject passing as a Christian male, after years working across France as, or often as, male. Doubly outed at or en route to Quebec City and held for a year in New France, they are deported for refusing to convert to Christianity and thereafter disappear from the record. This first major scholarly project centring this eighteenth century figure enters Brandeau / La Fargue into gender crossing histories; complicates the story's place in Canadian culture; offers it as a rich case within Atlantic and Diaspora studies; puts forth a focus on gender in Sephardic Jewish and converso diasporic studies of the colonial period; contributes to scholarship on transgender themes in children's literature; and proposes links between literary Sephardism, queer Indigenous and settler colonial studies. Methodological innovation yields insights at the intersection of historical practice and performance; and new archival evidence is uncovered. The case is established as an antecedent to contemporary discourse about belonging, difference and settler colonialism. An intersectional orientation provides a path for leveraging the story's “queer disruptive potential.” The research contributes to Gender, Queer, Canadian, Atlantic, Jewish and Diaspora Studies, Queer Historiography, Arts Practice as Research and Performance Studies. In Part I, “multicrossing” is elaborated as passing across multiple, simultaneous co-inscribing axes of signification. Through analysis of anachronies of moving between the 18th and 21st centuries, and an analysis of eruptions of the story within Canadian culture, the story's visibility is shown to be conditional and coincident with moments of preoccupation with national belonging. Analysis shows how sociopolitical forces constrain accounts of Brandeau / La Fargue as multicrosser. In Part II, the roles of desire and haunting in historical research are attended to through immersion in archival labour. Narration of this research process and its findings serves to elaborate a “heretic methodology”—a queer historiography where error, doubt, desire and haunting enable production of a texture of the historical subject's living in the absence of conclusive evidence. This reveals how affective connection can be operationalized in historical practice, and how transtemporal touch underpinning queer historiography produces “on the ground.” In Part III, the author's historical reenactments of Brandeau / La Fargue further our understanding of the relationship between body, memory and historical knowledge. The relationship between the performance practice of historical reenactment, and the performative nature of historical research is elaborated. An overarching contribution is “multigenre,” an epistemological intervention featuring dramatically different yet interinanimate research approaches and genres of outcome, distinct from inter- and transdisciplinarity. Multigenre offers one answer to the project's central concern: how to retell colonial era stories as queer, feminist, decolonial gesture.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,024 | 0,038 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».