Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracture Performance in the Viking Formation Using a Data-Driven Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The exploitation of oil from unconventional reservoirs has increased rapidly due to recent advances in horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. One of the main challenges in the exploitation of unconventional resources is the optimization of stimulation designs to maximize well performance. In recent years, data-driven methods have played a vital role in achieving operational, performance, and economic efficiencies in such resources. \n\nIn this study, data-driven predictive models were developed to evaluate hydraulic fracture stimulation design parameters and to identify oil production drivers in the Viking Formation. Both Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) models were used to analyze the data from 845 multi-stage hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in the Viking formation, Saskatchewan, Canada. Reservoir characteristics, such as well geographic location, average gas-oil ratio, net pay, and stimulation design parameters, including completion length, proppant concentration, proppant intensity, were included as inputs in the models. 365-day cumulative oil production (IP365) was used as a metric for well performance.\n\nMLR and RF were successfully used to develop models for predicting IP365. The performance of both models was compared, and RF model was selected for further investigation due to its superior performance. The optimum combination of hyperparameters for RF was found using Random Search and Grid Search methods. Furthermore, the K-Fold Cross Validation approach was employed to validate the predictive and generalization capabilities of the model. The importance of reservoir and stimulation parameters with respect to well performance was determined using the Permutation Feature Importance technique.\n\nModeling results indicated that completion length has the largest impact on oil production, followed by proppant intensity (proppant volume by completion length) and reservoir characteristics such as net pay. Furthermore, a high gas-oil ratio was found to have a detrimental effect on oil production. Partial dependence plots were used to visualize the relationship between each predictor variable and the model output. Results showed that, on average, wells in the study area with lateral length greater than 750 m tend to have above-average IP365. Proppant intensities ranging from 0.37 t/m to 0.49 t/m seem to be effective. A diminishing effect on production is observed in wells treated with higher values of proppant intensity. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were estimated to understand well performance on a well-by-well-basis. This method provided insights about the interactions between the predictor variables and the model output. \n\nResults from this study will be helpful for stimulation and production engineers to optimize stimulation designs and maximize well productivity in the Viking Formation. This data-driven approach can be applied to any other plays and seamlessly integrated in workflow processes. Moreover, this methodology allows engineers and geoscientists to make informed decisions in rapidly changing environments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».