An examination of how system orientated educational policies and processes affect leadership of transformative schools
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In most Western countries, ministers, policy makers and think-tanks are pressuring education leaders to drive higher academic performance in K-12 schools. This agenda is largely shaped by a focus on learner performance in national high-stakes tests in literacy and numeracy in schools and advanced subject examinations throughout secondary school. Many education critics believe that broader measures of educational system success are needed to better reflect and serve the needs, values and expectations of society (Hattie, 2019; Hargreaves, 2003). Most leaders of public education systems use comparisons of international data, such as PISA results, to instigate change in their systems. Instead, I chose to investigate how system-oriented educational policies and processes affected leadership of transformation in schools. I used an exemplar case of Alberta, Canada to elucidate the larger case of New South Wales, Australia. My interpretations of the findings revealed the importance of district-level/state-level nurturing of principals and other school leaders to enable them to transform practices and to simultaneously strive for success for all learners. The study results reveal the value of a shared vision that underpins all leadership layers of the education system, with a focus on professional learning and valuing educational expertise. High performance is enabled through communities of practice that promote collaboration, joint problem solving, customised outcomes and professional growth. In New South Wales my results point to the need for clear policies and processes that promote leadership to enhance engaging teaching, learning and formative assessment practices. Expertise in management and compliance at the system level was well regarded but it was considered too far from the school level to optimise effectiveness. A shift towards transforming operational models to work in more differentiated ways was needed, where parts of the system were more tightly connected. Drawing from the analysis in both cases, the role of contemporary, evidence-based exemplar practices of professional learning was a powerful enabler of transformation. Findings suggest that levels of systems leadership have key roles in strengthening system coherence, emphasising educational expertise due to the nature of the work leading learning. There is also a call for specialised leadership recruitment and training practices with greater responsiveness to school needs. The shift towards more collaborative, multidisciplinary leadership structures is required for transformative school systems along with a mechanism to match leaders with schools to ensure the most appropriate level of ‘fit’ to diverse school communities. The use of nuanced examples and exemplars may play a role in supporting the change needed in leadership approaches to achieve improved systems for future students.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».