Final Design of Auger Flighting Stretching Device for Elmer's Manufacturing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The following report outlines the complete design process of an Auger Flighting Stretching Device for Elmer’s Manufacturing, on behalf of Team 17, as part of the Capstone engineering design course. Elmer’s Manufacturing is an agricultural manufacturing company located in Altona, Manitoba. Elmer’s manufactures “Haulmaster” grain carts for increasing efficiency in transporting grain from combine to semi-truck. Haulmaster grain carts contain a series of augers to transport particulate grain out of the grain cart. Elmer’s currently faces a challenge with its auger manufacturing process. Augers are a weldment, manufactured from two components: A center tube and a pitched flighting. The pitched flighting is ordered with an oversized inner diameter, allowing the flighting to be easily slid over the center tube prior to welding. The flighting is then stretched over the center tube to eliminate the gap between the flighting and the center tube. This stretching process on Elmer’s current stretching table takes too long to complete a cycle and is labor-intensive. The team is tasked with designing a new auger flighting stretching device to improve the auger flighting stretching process. The auger flighting stretching device is expected to reduce the cycle time of the stretching operation, eliminate the manual labor from the stretching process, cost less than $50,000, and work with all configurations of Elmer’s augers. The team determined the most important needs of the project were that the design must be safe to use, the device must be able to be used by a single operator, and does not require manual labor to use the device. The team generated numerous conceptual designs for the auger flighting stretching device. As most of the concepts involved using variations of the same mechanical methods, the team created a systematic approach to generate ideas. The device was split into six functional subsystems: moving the gantry, guiding the gantry, rotational control, orientation, power source, and flighting interface. Concepts were systematically generated for the functional subsystems, and a thorough concept selection using weighted decision matrices was conducted. Eventually, the final design was chosen to consist of the main frame, attached to which are a spindle and tailstock, which hold the center tube of the auger. A single roller contacts the flighting, translating via a gantry rolling on linear rails, pulled by a roller chain which is powered by a hydraulic motor through roller chain reductions. A hydraulic disk brake attached to the spindle resists the rotation of the auger weldment, allowing the flighting to stretch in a horizontal orientation. A rigorous analysis of the final design was conducted, including analytical calculations and Finite Element Analysis of the structural and dynamic components of the device. All components, whether designed for manufacturing or specified purchased parts, were calculated to have a factor of safety exceeding two. The device also complies with ISO 14120 standard of safeguarded machinery. A job hazard analysis identifying risks and mitigation techniques was also formed by the team. A maintenance plan for dynamic components was included in the analysis. The final design created by the team has an estimated rolled-up cost of $17,101.11 and consists of readily available welded and assembled laser-cut sheet metal, machined, saw-cut, and purchased components. The device will theoretically meet the required cycle time decrease and will require no manual labor. A CAD model of the parts and overall assembly as well as a Bill of Materials for purchased components of the final design were supplied to Elmer’s. A recommendation is given to construct the final design per the specification of the team and develop the design to be integrated into Elmer’s production line after consistent performance of the device is achieved.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».