Framework for the Design of Seismically Isolated Part 9 Structures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Despite the recent advances in structural engineering made over the last century, earthquakes continue to pose a major risk to the lives and livelihoods of many communities. British Columbia is well known as a region at risk from seismic hazards, however, significant seismic risk extends to Canadians across the country as 70% of Quebec’s population lives in active seismic regions. Most single-family residential structures in Canada are built using Part 9, Housing and Small Buildings, of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). Part 9 provides conservative simplified design and analysis methods that facilitate design without engineering involvement. It is generally believed that Part 9 single family wood frame residential structures are resistant to seismic effects, however, the aftermath of several earthquakes have demonstrated that, while life safety resilience is fairly good, the economic losses are unacceptably high. To protect against this danger to life and livelihood the NBCC provides several ways to design structures for seismic events. One of the most promising of these is an emerging technology known as base isolation. Base isolators are specially designed structural components that effectively act as a suspension system, isolating the structure from the ground motion effects. While this technology has proven effective at protecting structures and their occupants, the current design methodology often requires custom base isolator designs and comprehensive engineering. This creates a significant cost barrier that disincentivizes application of base isolation to common Part 9 designed single family residential structures that normally avoid engineering involvement.To eliminate this cost barrier to widespread adoption of base isolation, a program was developed to perform the engineering seismic design for a base isolated single family residential structure. Currently the NBCC does not provide a design methodology for base isolated structures, and so the program utilizes the ASCE design method adapted for NBCC requirements. The program performs the design of the base isolated structure using a catalogue of pre-certified isolators, and structural characteristics and seismic data available to non-engineer Part 9 designers. This makes the program usable by non-technical experts who will be aided through a series of recommendations and provisions. The program produces key design data and performance metrics such as base shear, maximum deflection, distribution of loads, and the number of isolators required and their placement. The program was validated by time history analysis of common single family residential structure designs. Elastomeric isolators were proposed for the case study structures, and discussions and recommendations for the design of elastomeric bearings for Part 9 structures are proposed. It was determined that the developed program provides a suitable representation of the design characteristics and seismic response of single-family residential structures.This research serves to address and remove many of the barriers which have prevented widespread adoption of base isolation in residential structures. Through the development of this design methodology base isolation will move towards becoming available for widespread use in Part 9 single family residential structures in vulnerable regions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».