Gender, sexuality, and the influence of heteronormativity in elementary school classrooms: an investigation of the subjective experiences of pre-service and recent graduates from the McGill Bachelor of Ed.(kindergarten/elementary)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study examines the attitudes and perceptions of pre-service teachers and recent graduates with regards to gender and sexualities in elementary school classrooms, as well as their preparation to address these topics as elementary school teachers.The study also examines the ways that the Quebec Education Program supports hegemonic norms of heteronormativity.The eight participants were either currently enrolled in the McGill Bachelors of Kindergarten/Elementary Education or had graduated in 2017.Five pre-service teachers, and three recent graduates participated in focus groups that explored their experiences, attitudes, knowledge and beliefs about gender and sexuality within the elementary school classroom.They were questioned about the importance they associated with creating safe spaces for children to explore their gender identity and sexuality, the place that they saw these topics taking up in their B.Ed. program at McGill, as well as their familiarity with the Quebec Education Program with reference to these topics.The participants were asked to pinpoint experiences in the B. Ed program that disrupted or supported the construction of heteronormative narratives in teacher practices; identify teacher practices they had observed that supported heteronormativity; identify barriers to engaging in a disruption of heteronormativity; and identify ways that pre-service teachers could be better prepared to address these topics in and elementary school classroom.A variety of theoretical lenses are used throughout this research project including queer theory, feminist theory and post-structuralism.The themes found in the data include: the ease of relying on the gender binary; the need to create safe(r) spaces; isolated experiences of learning about the topics of gender and sexuality; the McGill program lacking info; and the need for the training to be mandatory.The implications of the results include suggestions for teacher practices that will allow for the creation of safe(r) spaces that allow for the disruption of heteronormativity, as well Sex: The characteristic assigned at birth based on the genitalia of an infant, most commonly male or female.Sexuality: Intimate, sexual, or romantic attraction towards other people, sometime expressed through a relationship.Heteronormativity: The structures and norms that assume heterosexuality/prescribe heterosexuality; and categorize other ways of being as deviant/othered.These structures are also reliant on the gender binary. Gender binary:The assumption that there are only two gender identities, and the disregard of gender existing on a spectrum.Safe(r)*: I subscribe to the belief that we can attempt to create a safe space through our practices; however, we cannot guarantee a completely safe space seeing as we do not control the actions of others.For this reason, I refer to them as safe(r) spaces seeing as they become safer through my practices.*The definition for safe(r) space does not come from either source.I frame the term within my own understanding of safe space and how I present and use it throughout the thesis.I have done this because this term may be contested in other literature; or presented as simply safe space.The definition demonstrates the intricacies that come with safe space.I choose to make the distinction between safe space and safe(r) space within my work by defining this term in this glossary.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».