Honouring lived experience wisdom: Healing and healing environments according to ‘family members’ in Indigenous-led alcohol harm reduction and culturally supportive housing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Honouring lived experience wisdom: Defining healing and healing environments according to ‘family members’ in Indigenous-led alcohol harm reduction and culturally supportive housing’ illustrates a strengths-based story of ‘culture as healing’ (CAH) and decolonized harm reduction for seven Indigenous people with experiences of homelessness and significant alcohol-related harm. Based in a broader dual-site study on the design, implementation, and evaluation of Indigenous-led Managed Alcohol Programs (MAPs), this research responds to gaps in knowledge on the implementation and impacts of Indigenous-led MAPs and CAH models among primarily western MAPs in Canada. Based in five years of relationship with the Aboriginal Coalition to End Homelessness Society (ACEH), I explore healing perspectives and experiences of ‘family members’ (residents) of the ACEH Indigenous Alcohol Harm Reduction Residence Program (IAHRRP) and Culturally Supportive House (CSH), located on Lekwungen and W̱SÁNEĆ territory (Victoria, BC). Objectives of this study aim to identify practices, policies, and principles that are reflective of ‘healing’ and ‘healing environments’ according to family members. This qualitative collaborative study is guided by Indigenous methodological principles and community protocols developed in partnership with the ACEH and Canadian Managed Alcohol Program Study (CMAPS) as part of an Indigenous-western/Settler research partnership. In outlining the methodological approach to this project, I critically explore my position and role as a Settler student, researcher, and nurse in this partnership and in relation to community. I draw upon three interrelated conceptual frameworks to inform analysis in relation to healing and culture, alcohol, and housing: the First Nations Mental Wellness Continuum Framework (FNMWCF) (Assembly of First Nations (AFN), Thunderbird Partnership Foundation, & Health Canada, 2015), Definition of Indigenous Homelessness in Canada (Thistle, 2017), and the ACEH Dual Model of Housing Care (Hunt-Jinnouchi et al., 2021). Across three manuscripts, I present 10 themes related to definitions of healing, impacts of the CSH and IAHRRP, and factors that promote ‘healing environments’ from the perspectives of family members. Paper one illustrates themes of family members’ definitions and experiences with CAH: Being in an Indigenous home with Indigenous people; Finding purpose and contributing to the home; Learning/re-learning and living Indigenous ways of being and doing; and Land-based healing. In paper two, themes reflecting healing impacts and healing environments of culturally supportive housing are presented: Respite from the street and system in an Indigenous space; Genuine connection; and being heard and mutually respected. Paper three focuses on themes of healing and healing environments in relation to the IAHRRP: A choice I’m making right now; Multiple pathways for connection to culture, with or without alcohol; and Giving me the reigns to take care of myself with a home. Lastly, I conclude with a set of recommendations for the design and implementation of Indigenous-led MAPs and CAH models guided by the perspectives of family members. Four recommendations draw upon learnings identified across the 10 themes, including to create spaces that reflect an “Indigenous home” of belonging and pride; offer land-based healing and teaching accessible to Indigenous people with experiences of homelessness and alcohol use; centralize lived experience wisdom in the development of practices and policies that address the unique safety and wellness definitions of Indigenous people with experiences of homelessness, systemic, and street-based violence; and facilitate multiple pathways to connect to culture as healing. While recommendations are most responsive to the highly localized context of the IAHRRP and CSH, they may offer transferable insights for the design and development of future Indigenous-led MAPs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,037 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».