Integrating career development into biosystems engineering
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Career development is an important aspect of emerging adulthood and the experiences of post-secondary students. Particularly in the modern context, where technological advancement has significantly altered the world of work and will continue to do so, students need to be equipped with the skills to manage their careers and move forward amidst career uncertainty. This study is a grounded theory examination of students’ experiences of career supports integrated into a biosystems engineering design course offered in the first year of a Biosystems Engineering Program at the University of Manitoba. Very little research has been conducted on the integration of career development into the classroom, though there are promising preliminary studies that speak to the potential positive implications for students. Using the systems theory framework of career development as the theoretical framework, this study seeks to better understand how students in a professional engineering program, who are typically thought to be career decided, experience in-class career supports. The literature review in this thesis examines the central focus of this study, the career development of post-secondary students, and covers two cognate areas, emerging adulthood with a focus on vocational and engineering identity development and reflection in experiential learning. Through utilization of constructivist grounded theory, a rigorous, social constructivist approach to the study design and qualitative analyses of participant interviews and student coursework is presented. The study proposes a low-level theoretical model of these experiences, entitled Becoming a Biosystems Engineering Student, which demonstrates the ways high school students interested in math and science are drawn to first-year engineering, where they tend to use deficit language to describe biosystems engineering. Students then progress to biosystems by either stumbling into biosystems engineering or a planned journey to biosystems engineering. Once in biosystems, students are influenced by the integrated career development curriculum, where they become more connected to their peers, professionals, and program, learn more about the labour market, clarify career options, and eventually begin to see options for themselves, define biosystems, and increase their comfort in an uncertain labour market. This progresses over time, facilitated by the career curriculum integrated into their coursework, with students shifting from identities as more general students to a biosystems engineering student identity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».