Impact of Sociodemographic Factors on the Distribution of Orthodontists
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: To identify the location of orthodontists and orthodontist service sites (OSSs) in Canada, to classify these OSSs by modality, and determine which, if any, sociodemographic factors may predict where orthodontists choose to practice. Methods: Dental regulatory authorities in Canada were contacted to obtain information on the practicing orthodontists in each jurisdiction. The full postal code for each OSS in Canada was obtained and each location was classified by practice modality and Forward Sortation Area (FSA). Sociodemographic variables of interest by FSA were extracted from Statistics Canada 2021 Census data, which included population, education, income, ethnocultural characteristics, and household characteristics. Correlations and associations between sociodemographic variables and practice locations by FSA were assessed. A binomial logistic regression was used to determine which explanatory variables were most predictive of the presence of orthodontist in an FSA. Results: There were found to be 1,181 OSSs in Canada, the majority being orthodontic specialty offices (74.8%). Several of the explanatory variables studied were found to have a weak or moderate correlation with the number of orthodontists and OSSs in an FSA, including Total Population (r = 0.45); the Proportion of Individuals with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher (r = 0.33); the Median Value of Dwellings (r = 0.35); the Proportion of Immigrants (r = 0.38); and the Proportion Married or Living Common Law (r = -0.20). There was a statistically significant association between the presence of an orthodontist in an FSA, and whether the FSA was categorized as urban or rural (p < 0.001). Population, education, income, ethnocultural, and household characteristic variables were significantly associated with the presence of an orthodontist in an FSA, although the specific explanatory variables were not identical in urban and rural areas. In rural communities Total Population, and the Percentage of Households Earning $100,000 and Over were most predictive of an orthodontist being present in an FSA, explaining 25.3% of the variance in the final logistic model. In urban communities Total Population, Median Age of the Population, Proportion of Individuals with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher, Median Value of Dwellings in an Area, and Household Size were most predictive of an orthodontist being present in an FSA explaining 37.1% of the variance in the final logistic model. Conclusions: This study is the first of its kind to provide information about the practice landscape of orthodontic offices in Canada, and the relationship between sociodemographic factors and orthodontist practice locations. The results of this study can be used by residents, orthodontists, graduate programs, regulatory bodies, government and policy makers to better serve the profession and public. It may also aid orthodontists in identifying areas in Canada with favorable sociodemographic characteristics to set up an orthodontic practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».