International Training Program in Support of Safety Analysis: 3D S.UN.COP — Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D Thermalhydraulics/Neutron-Kinetics Coupled Codes Seminar
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thermal-hydraulic system computer codes are extensively used \nworldwide for analysis of nuclear facilities by utilities, regulatory \nbodies, nuclear power plant designers and vendors, nuclear fuel \ncompanies, research organizations, consulting companies, and technical \nsupport organizations. The computer code user represents a source of \nuncertainty that can influence the results of system code calculations. \nThis influence is commonly known as the ‘user effect’ and stems from the \nlimitations embedded in the codes as well as from the limited capability \nof the analysts to use the codes. Code user training and qualification \nis an effective means for reducing the variation of results caused by \nthe application of the codes by different users. This paper describes a \nsystematic approach to training code users who, upon completion of the \ntraining, should be able to perform calculations making the best \npossible use of the capabilities of best estimate codes. In other words, \nthe program aims at contributing towards solving the problem of user \neffect. The 3D S.UN.COP (Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D COuPled code \ncalculations) seminars have been organized as follow-up of the proposal \nto IAEA for the Permanent Training Course for System Code Users. Eleven \nseminars have been held at University of Pisa (two in 2004), at The \nPennsylvania State University (2004), at the University of Zagreb \n(2005), at the School of Industrial Engineering of Barcelona (January- \nFebruary 2006), in Buenos Aires, Argentina (October 2006), requested by \nAutoridad Regulatoria Nuclear (ARN), Nucleoelectrica Argentina S.A \n(NA-SA) and Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), at the College \nStation, Texas A&M, (January-February 2007), in Hamilton and Niagara \nFalls, Ontario (October 2007) requested by Atomic Energy Canada Limited \n(AECL), Canadian Nuclear Society (CNS) and Canadian Nuclear Safety \nCommission (CNSC), in Petten, The Netherlands (October 2008) in \ncooperation with the Institute of Energy of the Joint Research Center of \nthe European Commission (IE-JRC-EC), at the Royal Institute of \nTechnology, Stockholm (October 2009), in Petten, The Netherlands \n(October 2010) in cooperation with the Institute of Energy of the Joint \nResearch Center of the European Commission (IE-JRC-EC) and in at \nWilmington (North Carolina, USA) in cooperation with General Electric \nHitachi, Westinghouse, AREVA NP and INL. It was recognized that such \ncourses represented both a source of continuing education for current \ncode users and a mean for current code users to enter the formal \ntraining structure of a proposed ‘permanent’ stepwise approach to user \ntraining. The 3D S.UN.COP 2011 at Wilmington was successfully held with \nthe attendance of more than 20 participants coming from more than 10 \ncountries and 15 different institutions (universities, vendors and \nnational laboratories). More than 30 scientists (coming from more than \n10 countries and 20 different institutions) were involved in the \norganization of the seminar, presenting theoretical aspects of the \nproposed methodologies and holding the training and the final \nexamination. A certificate (LA Code User grade) was released to \nparticipants that successfully solved the assigned problems. The twelfth \nseminar will be held (April 2012) in Daejeon, South Korea in cooperation \nwith the “Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute”, involving more than \n30 scientists between lecturers and code developers \n(http://www.nrgspg.ing.unipi.it/3dsuncop/).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».