MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6991903404

Interannual variability and long-term trends of surface hydrography around the Prince Edward Island Archipelago, Southern Ocean

2022· dissertation· en· W6991903404 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolar frontAntarctic oscillationGeostrophic windArctic oscillationEkman transportOcean currentCurrent (fluid)Sea surface temperatureForcing (mathematics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Prince Edward Islands (PEIs) Archipelago are situated in a prime location for the study of ecosystem response to intrinsic climate variability in the Southern Ocean and the impact of climate change. They are positioned in the Polar Frontal Zone, which is constrained by the subAntarctic Front and the Antarctic Polar Front, all of which are part of the strong, uninterrupted Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC). Due to its remoteness and challenging accessibility, there is a severe lack of data in the Southern Ocean and at the PEIs. The existing data are only available as single points observations or snapshots from past research cruises. This study thus makes use of 23 years (1993 – 2016) of satellite and reanalysis data to determine the annual/interannual and long-term variability of Sea Surface Temperature (SST), wind forcing and surface circulation at the PEIs and determine whether natural modes of climate variability like the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Southern Annular Mode (SAM) or SemiAnnual Oscillation (SAO) were affecting these parameters. SST, wind speed, wind stress curl and the Ekman current did not express any long-term trend. A significant increasing but very small trend was only perceived in the geostrophic current and total surface current which was concluded to not be associated with the intensification of the ACC caused by a more positive SAM phase. The anomalies in SST showed striking interannual variability at a periodicity of 0.8, 2.8 and 7.5 years showing a similar pattern to that of ENSO with a periodicity of 1.5, 2.9 and 6 years. There has however been no relationship established between SST and any of the climate modes, but the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave (ACW), which is one of ENSO's teleconnection, could be responsible for the interannual changes seen in the SST anomalies. The anomalies in wind speed did not show any apparent periodicity and no relationship with ENSO. More so, while the impact of SAM and SAO has been seen on the westerly wind belt which governs the latitude of the PEIs, no correlation was established between the wind speed at the islands and SAM or SAO. The anomalies in wind stress curl presented no visible interannual variability but some sign of short-term variability. There was also no link 2 established between wind stress curl at the PEIs and any of the climate modes. Finally, a periodicity of 1.3 and 4 years was seen in the geostrophic current anomalies which also coincided with the pattern of ENSO but only showed minor correlation with ENSO. The ACW was deduced to perhaps also be responsible for the surface currents anomalies since the ACW is primarily propagated within the ACC. The trends perceived in the parameters considered for this study and the impact of climate modes on them appeared to be different to patterns which has been historically observed across the Southern Ocean. This further confirms the fact that the neighbouring oceanography and surface wind speed variability surrounding the PEIs differ from other regions of the Southern Ocean, most probably due to the frequent mesoscale instability such as eddies and frontal movement influencing the region. The impact of climate change on the PEIs ecosystem thus cannot be expected to be the same as the rest of the Southern Ocean.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,180
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)Même sujetOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesTravaux en français237 207