Library Trends 13 (3) 1965: Regional Public Library Systems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
reported that prior to 1937 there had been only two multi-county libraries in the United States and four regional libraries in Canada.By 1944, fourteen more regional libraries (all in the southeastern United States) had been added to this meager list.Oliver Garceau, in his volume for the Public Library Inquiry3 pointed out that states had generally approached the creation of the larger unit by combining counties rather than by attempting to create "the special district..,for it had been found by students of government to contribute extensively to the chaos of American local government ., , He reported: "Most of the active library extension agencies can now point to two or three regional units within their borders . . . the great majority ...are two-county affair^."^Their scarcity at that time may help identify the few extension agencies which the author regarded as "active."Garceau stated that at the time of the Inquiry "some regions organized less than ten years ago are already eroding, . . .counties have been glad to be on their own again."4He took a generally dim view of this kind of regional library, and his label of the regional movement as "the bitter struggle to destroy or to swallow up village, city, and county li- brarie~"h as been a thorn in the flesh of many state agencies since its publication, and is not exact.Concerning this alleged condition of "erosion" and "bitter struggle," by 1963 only two of the twelve multi-county regional libraries in the United States ten years before the Public Library Inquiry had dissolved into single county libraries.The other ten had been reorganized and proliferated into twenty multi-county libraries, with the number of counties involved having grown from forty-four to seventy-three.And, more surprising still, there were at least 140 additional multi-county regional libraries with more than 400 counties in~olved.~The limiting "at least" has been used since it is highly likely that it has not been possible to identify all existing examples in all states, nor determine the status of all demonstrations.In all but nine states some form, or combination of forms, of regional libraries has been put into operation.Twenty-four states have one or more multi-county regional libraries.Four of these plus five others are employing the demonstration method for the establishment of new multi-county regions.In fourteen states there are more than forty branches of the state library extension agency, with two states having both multi-county libraries and state agency branches.In view of the recommendation in The Public Library Inquirye generally and of the doubts so well expressed by Garceau, the question
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,014 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».