MF035 Maine Folklife Survey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The survey was developed to identify and document folklife resources within the state. Material culture collections were identified, and traditional festivals and community events were recorded using audio and video equipment. Almost a hundred interviews were conducted with informants during the course of the project. The interviews have been accessioned in summary form instead of with full transcriptions, and they are open to the public. Through a series of questionnaires and interviews, fieldworkers were able to locate and document private collections of photographs, artifacts, family records, etc. The materials found within the Maine Folklife Survey are most valuable to researchers seeking leads or preliminary information. The survey project laid valuable groundwork for future projects. However, it is only the diligent researcher who can make productive use of the printed Index. It is at best simply a finding list. Though a variety of topics are included, such as unpublished manuscripts (letters, scrapbooks, business records), local publications, (county histories, church or civic group cookbooks), material culture (kitchenware, farm implements, school and household furnishings, textiles) and ephemera (broadsides, postcards, letterhead), the Index lacks vital information on the quantity and condition of materials. The slide/tape program, "Maine's Folklife," presents an overview of the traditional arts and occupations of Maine and the Canadian Maritime Provinces. Other resources include a black and white photo exhibit, "Maine Folklife 1980", and a color exhibit, "The Lobster Buoy". These are the results of the many fieldwork photographs collected during research. The most valuable records of the Maine Folklife Survey materials are the fieldwork journals kept by researchers. Although these materials are not at present available to the public, they provide significant information about the regions, informants and folklife encountered during the study. The Archives also houses the questionnaire forms completed for the survey which often provide more specific details than those included in the Index. A sampling (not exhaustive) of interview topics covered during the survey includes crooked knives and gum boxes; river drives; country music; supernatural powers; wood carving; Skowhegan Fair; scrimshaw; vernacular architecture; dowsing; canoe building; fiddling and fiddle making; moose calling; livestock auctions; horse and ox pulling; bean hole beans; Ossipee Valley Fair; Jonesport lobster boat races; Franco-American music; Fryeburg Fair; guides and guiding; storytelling; buckwheat milling; lobstering; Blue Hill Fair; and blueberry raking. The collection includes artifacts, photographs, videotapes, audio tapes approximately 80 hours), field journals, questionnaires forms, and other materials.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,090 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».