Methodologies for the Integrity Assessment of Pipelines Containing Cracks
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cracking is a well-known failure mechanism that threatens the structural integrity of energy pipelines. As a special type of cracking, stress corrosion cracking (SCC) occurs if suitable tensile stress and corrosive environment are present simultaneously. When the basicity of the local electrolyte is close to 7, the failure mechanism is termed as near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking (NNpHSCC). Cracks, including NNpHSCC, markedly diminish the burst capacity of pipelines through reducing their local wall thickness. Although commonly observed on in-service pipelines and being one of the leading causes of pipeline failures, the studies on cracks, especially NNpHSCC, have not yet received sufficient attention in academia. This thesis conducts a general integrity assessment of pipelines containing cracks and NNpHSCC defects from different aspects using various research tools and methodologies.\nThe first study presents a review of four existing growth models for NNpHSCC defects on buried oil and gas pipelines: Chen et al.’s model, two models developed at the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) and Xing et al.’s model. The predictive accuracy of these growth models is investigated based on crack growth rates obtained from full-scale tests conducted at the CanmetMATERIALS of Natural Resources Canada using pipe specimens that are in contact with NNpH soils and subjected to cyclic internal pressures. The comparison of the observed and predicted crack growth rates indicates that the hydrogen-enhanced decohesion (HEDE) component of Xing et al.’s model leads to on average reasonably accurate predictions. The predictive accuracies of the other three models are markedly poorer.\nThe second study applies the mechanics-based approach and five machine learning (ML) algorithms to classify the failure mode (leak or rupture) of steel oil and gas pipelines containing longitudinally oriented surface cracks. The employed ML algorithms consist of three single learning algorithms, and two ensemble learning algorithms. The classification accuracy of the mechanics-based approach and ML algorithms are evaluated based on full-scale burst tests of pipe specimens collected from the open literature. The analysis results reveal that the mechanics-based approach leads to highly biased classifications: many leaks erroneously classified as ruptures. In contrast, ML algorithms lead to markedly improved accuracy, and the ensemble learning algorithms yield superior classification performance compared to the single learning algorithms. The rationale behind these observations is also thoroughly discussed.\nThe third study presents the improvement of a widely used burst capacity model for steel oil and gas pipelines that contain longitudinal external surface cracks, namely the CorLAS model, through the addition of a correction factor that is quantified by the Gaussian process regression (GPR). The correction factor is assumed to depend on four non-dimensional input features that characterize both the crack geometry and pipe material properties. A database consisting of full-scale burst tests of pipe specimens that contain longitudinal surface cracks is established based on the open literature, which is employed to train the GPR model and evaluate its performance. It is shown that GPR is highly effective in improving the accuracy of the CorLAS model predictions. The improvement is further shown to have a marked effect on the time-dependent probability of burst of pipelines containing growing surface cracks.\nThe fourth study conducts time-dependent system reliability analysis of pipelines containing multiple longitudinal surface cracks considering leak and rupture. The Gaussian process-based ML algorithms are harnessed for multiple purposes, encompassing the determination of burst capacity (this endeavor has been successfully accomplished within the scope of the third study), the formulation of a model for segregating the two failure modes, and the creation of surrogate models for two distinct NNpHSCC growth models. The impacts of the spatial variability of various pipe attributes, material properties and environmental conditions on the system reliability are investigated. The Gaussian process-based ML algorithms are shown to be highly effective in identifying the failure modes and predicting the crack growth. The system reliability analysis results indicate that the probability of leak increases more rapidly than the probability of rupture as time increases. Moreover, the spatial variability of the majority of the random variables considered in this study has only marginal effects on the system failure probability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle