Nepal: country report for use in refugee claims based on persecution relating to sexual orientation and gender identity
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"This Country Report on the conditions faced by LGBT persons in Nepal is intended to provide a\ncomprehensive and up-to-date survey of relevant legislation, case law, scholarship, and documentation from governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and the media. Due to language and translation-related issues, however, it is necessarily confined to materials available in English.\nThis report reveals a society in transition. Nepal is legislatively en route to greater acceptance of LGBT persons, but prejudice against homosexuality remains deeply entrenched in public opinion and in institutional actors, such as the police force.\nNepal is currently in the middle of a prolonged process of constitutional reform (See below: Australian Government Refugee Review Tribunal, Country Advice on Nepal – Homosexuals and State Protection), and is operating under an interim constitution. In 2007, the Supreme Court struck down legislation criminalizing “unnatural sex” and directed the government to end discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (See below: International Gay and Lesbian Commission, IGLHRC and\nLambda Legal Consulting with Nepali Government on LGBTI Rights Protections). However, much of the legislation has not yet been updated to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling. While the discriminatory laws remain on the books, they are not enforced (See below: International Lesbian and Gay Association, Nepal Law).\nDespite this positive trajectory, NGO and Media Reports make it clear that a great deal of work remains to be done. NGOs have documented extensive discrimination, harassment, violence, police brutality, and detention without cause directed against LGBT people in Nepal. In fact, the overwhelming majority of human rights violations reported by these NGOs were perpetrated by government officials, notably police\nofficers. All of these problems appear to be especially prevalent for “third gender” (i.e., trangender, called “metis” in Nepal) individuals. Furthermore, in May 2011 the Supreme Court broke from its progressive trend and dismissed an appeal by a lesbian woman who had been expelled from the Nepalese army because of her sexual orientation (See below: United States Department of State, 2010 Country\nReport on Human Rights Practices (Nepal); Tara Bhattarai, “Nepal Plans to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage, Discrimination Persists”), which may indicate a back peddling of the court’s earlier advances."
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle