Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Banding Northern Saw-whet Owls in MassachusettsEach fall, as cold weather brings snow cover to northern regions, numbers of Saw-whet owls move south in search of food and cover for the winter.These owls typically do not relocate in the same wintering and breeding areas each year as "true" migrant species do.For many purposes, however, their overall pattern of movement, southward in fall and northward in spring, is called migration.Until about twenty years ago, Northern Saw-whet Owls were thought to follow only one or two major migration routes.During the 1990s, however, the expanding network of Saw-whet banding stations across the U.S. and Canada began to document the broad seasonal movements of this species (Gentes 2002).The presence of these small, secretive raptors in Massachusetts was something of a mystery until 1994 and the start of Danielle Smith's Saw-whet banding project at Daniel Webster Wildlife Sanctuary in Marshfield (Smith 2002).In fall 2003 the owlbanding station opened at Lookout Rock in Northbridge (Clayton 2004) and joined other stations already monitoring Saw-whets in the state.Since then, in cooperation with the owl-banding network, the Lookout Rock team has learned a great deal about Saw-whets and their migration: where they come from, weather conditions that affect their flight, and some of the places they visit.Last spring, we combined the Lookout Rock data with that of other Massachusetts owl-banding stations to get a better understanding of Saw-whet migration in the state.From west to east, the six stations are Hopkins Memorial Forest (Williamstown), South Hadley, Lookout Rock (Northbridge), Drumlin Farm Wildlife Sanctuary (Lincoln), Blue Hills Reservation (Milton/Quincy), and Daniel Webster Wildlife Sanctuary (Marshfield). How Many Saw-whets Are Banded Each Year?The number of Northern Saw-whet Owls netted at banding stations varies from site to site and from year to year.Some of the fluctuation appears to be cyclical.Across eastern North America, there has been a large increase in the number banded every fourth year since 1995 (U.S. Bird Banding Laboratory).In 2006 there was a major decrease in the East -only 416 Saw-whets were netted in Massachusetts (Figure 1).In 2007, however, the six banding stations netted a combined total of over 1100 Saw-whet Owls!An interesting exception to this pattern, Hopkins Memorial Forest in the northwest corner of the state, did not experience a drop in 2006, nor did it have a Northern Saw-whet Owl.Photograph courtesy of U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service. AO = Attacks own species; AL = Attacks larger species; AS = Attacks smaller species; ABL = Attacked by larger species; ABS = Attacked by smaller speciesBirds are also in a hurry when feeding at bird feeders.The longer they are feeding on open ground or at platform or hanging feeders, the longer they are vulnerable to predation.Anyone who regularly feeds birds in winter is aware that feeders concentrate birds and attract accipiters and even shrikes.Hence, acquiring food in a hurry and thus reducing the probability of predation may make the energetic costs associated with aggression worthwhile.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,890 | 0,883 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».